Match Performance
Your Performance
60.39% of winner
Place:11 / 18
Match %:60.39%
Match Pts:1341.87
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:58.09%
Std Dev:15.0
Spread:81.8 pts
Hits:340A 100C 13D 9M 1NS
Best:
92.71% (S4)
Worst:
10.87% (S1)
Division Winner
Bartosz Szczęsny
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2221.96
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:96.19%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:16.1 pts
Hits:385A 70C 6D 1M
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
83.88% (S14)
10%
55%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 5.1× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
56.96%
17 stages · 26.70% – 76.60%
Low HF(Technical)
61.06%
7 stages · 10.87% – 92.71%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
62.97%
12 stages · 10.87% – 92.71%
Medium(13-24 shots)
51.13%
8 stages · 26.70% – 64.68%
Long(25+ shots)
62.92%
4 stages · 56.70% – 69.35%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 18 | 10.87% | 0.5326 | 52.57 | 9A 1C 2M | +359.93% | -50.00% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 14 | 52.45% | 3.2464 | 17.25 | 10A 2C | +84.10% | -3.45% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Low | 8 | 64.68% | 3.2129 | 32.37 | 18A 4C 2D | +51.69% | -1.89% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Low | 3 | 92.71% | 4.1999 | 13.81 | 11A 1C | +15.86% | +7.41% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 8 | 63.82% | 3.5881 | 27.87 | 16A 6C 2D | +45.08% | -7.41% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Low | 8 | 69.35% | 3.3745 | 36.45 | 21A 9C 1D 1M | +16.68% | -19.08% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 17 | 26.70% | 1.4884 | 51.06 | 16A 5C 1D 2M | +163.60% | -29.63% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 7 | 56.70% | 3.5468 | 40.60 | 25A 6C 1D | +67.08% | -5.26% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 11 | 65.80% | 3.3582 | 16.08 | 10A 1C 1D | +51.98% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 16 | 39.61% | 2.0941 | 44.41 | 18A 4C 1D 1M | +117.38% | -13.89% | - | ||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Low | 7 | 81.37% | 3.8877 | 13.89 | 9A 3C | +14.42% | -6.90% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 7 | 73.58% | 5.3886 | 9.65 | 8A 4C | +21.84% | -10.34% | - | ||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 8 | 76.60% | 5.8764 | 9.87 | 11A 1C | +30.56% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Low | 12 | 62.22% | 3.0405 | 17.76 | 9A 3C | +54.97% | -3.57% | - | ||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 14 | 54.14% | 3.3873 | 27.16 | 15A 9C 1NS | +46.49% | -20.69% | - | ||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Low | 16 | 44.23% | 2.1682 | 37.82 | 13A 9C 1M | +64.08% | -27.43% | - | ||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Med | 14 | 50.38% | 3.6910 | 14.63 | 9A 3C | +78.63% | -10.00% | - | ||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 12 | 63.08% | 4.2111 | 35.62 | 27A 5C | +56.43% | -1.32% | - | ||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Med | 11 | 52.51% | 4.2574 | 20.20 | 20A 2C 2M | +43.67% | -24.56% | - | ||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 8 | 69.40% | 4.0375 | 13.87 | 10A 2C | +39.12% | -3.45% | - | ||
Stage 21 Stage 21 Med | 11 | 59.76% | 3.5461 | 14.10 | 8A 3C 1D | +54.95% | -7.41% | - | ||
Stage 22 Stage 22 Med | 10 | 60.48% | 3.7383 | 13.91 | 8A 4C | +53.53% | -7.14% | - | ||
Stage 23 Stage 23 Med | 7 | 63.61% | 3.3774 | 28.72 | 16A 5C 2D | +39.89% | -11.01% | - | ||
Stage 24 Stage 24 Med | 8 | 62.57% | 4.0698 | 34.40 | 23A 8C 1D | +49.18% | -6.67% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.