Przemysław Wrzesiński

POLISH OPEN 2025 POWERED BY CESKA ZBROJOWKA i Halinka Arms Cup PCC L3Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
53.74% of winner
Place:14 / 18
Match %:53.74%
Match Pts:1194.18
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:51.70%
Std Dev:11.4
Spread:45.6 pts
Hits:294A 131C 25D 12M 1NS 2P
Best:
71.02% (S4)
Worst:
25.40% (S14)
Division Winner
Bartosz Szczęsny
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2221.96
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:96.19%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:16.1 pts
Hits:385A 70C 6D 1M
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
83.88% (S14)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 2.8× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
53.45%
17 stages · 26.08% – 68.89%
Low HF(Technical)
47.07%
7 stages · 25.40% – 71.02%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
53.09%
12 stages · 25.40% – 71.02%
Medium(13-24 shots)
53.28%
8 stages · 26.08% – 66.35%
Long(25+ shots)
47.77%
4 stages · 40.78% – 58.51%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Low
1448.64%2.383220.987A 5C
+83.55%
-10.71%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
1645.81%2.835914.814A 7C 1D
+58.06%
-27.59%
-
Stage 3
Stage 3
Low
1349.32%2.449639.1914A 8C 2D
+83.65%
-9.43%
-
Stage 4
Stage 4
Low
771.02%3.217515.548A 3C 1D
+30.37%
-7.41%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
1062.07%3.489824.9314A 9C 1M
+29.78%
-19.44%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Low
1640.78%1.984340.8219A 8C 2D 3M
1P
+30.67%
-46.71%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Med
866.35%3.699727.5716A 7C 1D
+42.33%
-5.56%
-
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
1446.68%2.919937.3319A 11C 1D 1M 1NS
+53.62%
-28.29%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
1456.53%2.885119.4110A 2C
+83.46%
+3.70%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
1258.99%3.118433.3517A 6C 1D
+63.24%
-3.70%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Low
1756.16%2.682916.405A 6C 1D
+35.09%
-24.14%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
1744.25%3.240712.966A 3C 3D
+63.64%
-27.59%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
1660.47%4.639211.649A 3C
+53.97%
-6.90%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Low
1725.40%1.241120.959A 1D 2M
+82.81%
-53.57%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
1157.15%3.575526.2913A 9C 2D
+41.80%
-18.97%
-
Stage 16
Stage 16
Low
1546.70%2.289235.8214A 7C 1D 1M
+55.40%
-27.43%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Med
961.10%4.476412.5110A 2C
+52.75%
-6.67%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
1458.51%3.906035.3323A 7C 2D
+55.16%
-9.21%
-
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
1826.08%2.114322.2314A 5C 2D 3M
1P
+58.11%
-58.77%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
1263.45%3.691014.6310A 1C 1D
+46.74%
-6.90%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Med
1635.35%2.097915.736A 4C 1D 1M
+72.86%
-38.89%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Med
768.89%4.258314.0912A
+55.52%
+7.14%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
1059.60%3.164432.5518A 4C 1D
+58.55%
-5.50%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
1345.11%2.934443.6217A 14C 1D
+89.16%
-14.67%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.