Pavel Mendelev

Extreme Euro Open 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
72.77% of winner
Place:9 / 17
Match %:72.77%
Match Pts:1947.23
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:69.03%
Std Dev:9.2
Spread:37.3 pts
Hits:452A 95C 11D 6M 2NS
Best:
85.00% (S10)
Worst:
47.70% (S19)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2676.00
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:94.91%
Std Dev:6.1
Spread:18.1 pts
Hits:491A 64C 8D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
81.93% (S7)
40%
70%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 2.1× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
68.51%
27 stages · 47.70% – 85.00%
Low HF(Technical)
76.71%
3 stages · 75.33% – 77.63%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
70.65%
14 stages · 49.89% – 78.21%
Medium(13-24 shots)
68.37%
11 stages · 47.70% – 85.00%
Long(25+ shots)
68.31%
5 stages · 59.92% – 74.90%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
870.11%4.666121.8620A 4C 1NS
+25.42%
-12.07%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
869.17%3.788135.1125A 6C 1M
+31.70%
-8.90%
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
874.56%4.347813.3411A 1C
+44.06%
+7.41%
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
971.88%3.993235.0623A 8C 1D
+28.14%
-7.89%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
1072.35%4.313722.9520A 3C 1M
+24.39%
-10.00%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Med
578.21%4.261613.6111A 1C
+37.34%
+7.41%
Stage 7
Stage 7
Low
877.63%3.147018.4311A 1C
+24.53%
-3.33%
-
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
968.26%4.158014.4312A
+46.50%
0.00%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
1359.27%3.795211.3310A 1C 1M
+20.92%
-28.33%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
485.00%6.487214.4917A 3C
+12.85%
-4.08%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Med
674.55%5.61808.909A 1C 2D
+28.99%
-3.85%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
972.70%3.675127.2117A 5C
+29.76%
-5.66%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
1548.62%2.799727.8616A 6C 1M 1NS
+39.51%
-32.17%
Stage 14
Stage 14
Med
965.16%4.059312.818A 4C
+37.59%
-10.34%
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
774.90%5.287426.1024A 6C
+27.94%
-4.17%
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
1159.92%3.568739.2324A 6C 2D
+53.72%
-7.89%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Low
975.33%3.698614.6010A 1C 1D
+19.48%
-10.00%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
1062.79%3.719019.3611A 5C 2D
+33.33%
-16.28%
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
1247.70%2.949432.2119A 3C 1D 1M
+91.50%
-8.65%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
578.29%4.215726.3321A 2C
+32.51%
+3.74%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Low
677.17%3.750814.9310A 2C
+34.38%
+3.70%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Med
780.24%5.170821.6621A 2C 1D
+26.89%
+1.82%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
870.17%4.190624.3415A 9C
+27.50%
-10.53%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
877.96%4.087613.7010A 2C
+28.28%
0.00%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
1066.11%5.328628.1528A 3C 1D
+51.26%
0.00%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
770.16%3.964813.629A 3C
+37.44%
-3.57%
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
1163.31%4.012312.968A 4C
+52.11%
-3.70%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
1549.89%3.568512.0510A 1C 1M
+65.75%
-17.31%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
776.35%4.592212.6311A 1C
+35.66%
+3.57%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
1064.61%3.706115.6511A 1C
+49.62%
-3.33%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.