Gyula Miglecz

Extreme Euro Open 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
78.84% of winner
Place:6 / 17
Match %:78.84%
Match Pts:2109.88
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:74.85%
Std Dev:10.4
Spread:43.1 pts
Hits:473A 78C 8D 5M 1NS
Best:
93.38% (S17)
Worst:
50.26% (S1)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2676.00
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:94.91%
Std Dev:6.1
Spread:18.1 pts
Hits:491A 64C 8D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
81.93% (S7)
50%
75%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 2.4× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
74.06%
27 stages · 50.26% – 87.94%
Low HF(Technical)
86.46%
3 stages · 81.31% – 93.38%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
74.37%
14 stages · 53.43% – 93.38%
Medium(13-24 shots)
76.36%
11 stages · 50.26% – 87.47%
Long(25+ shots)
73.06%
5 stages · 67.42% – 76.64%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
1450.26%3.344931.6917A 7C
+81.81%
-8.62%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
575.91%4.157335.6026A 6C
+33.53%
+1.37%
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
487.94%5.128211.7012A
+26.35%
+11.11%
-
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
876.64%4.257735.2327A 5C
+28.76%
-1.32%
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
584.70%5.050122.9722A 2C
+24.50%
+5.45%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Med
873.17%3.987212.549A 1C 2D
+26.54%
-7.41%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Low
484.69%3.433516.3110A 2C
+10.20%
-6.67%
-
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
1355.19%3.362012.7910A 1C 1M
+29.85%
-28.33%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
1259.45%3.807111.8211A 1M
+26.15%
-25.00%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
584.10%6.418713.7115A 4C 1D
+6.78%
-10.20%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Med
1453.43%4.026814.9012A
+115.94%
+15.38%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
583.73%4.232424.1018A 4C
+14.93%
-3.77%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
373.49%4.231826.2321A 2C
+31.35%
-3.48%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Med
478.90%4.915311.8011A 1C
+26.75%
0.00%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
676.20%5.378826.4026A 4C
+29.41%
-1.39%
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
867.42%4.015733.1225A 6C 1M
+29.78%
-12.50%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Low
393.38%4.585012.6511A 1C
+3.52%
-3.33%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
872.87%4.315819.0014A 4C
+30.85%
-4.65%
-
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
476.91%4.755622.7118A 6C
+35.02%
+3.85%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
960.60%3.263529.1119A 3C 1D 1NS
+46.50%
-11.21%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Low
581.31%3.952014.1710A 2C
+27.54%
+3.70%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Med
585.24%5.492920.3920A 4C
+19.45%
+1.82%
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
487.47%5.223622.5923A 1C
+18.33%
+3.51%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
779.11%4.148113.5010A 2C
+26.40%
0.00%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
969.33%5.587724.1626A 5C 1M
+29.82%
-10.00%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
673.07%4.128812.119A 1C 2D
+22.20%
-10.71%
-
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
684.11%5.330910.8811A 1C
+27.70%
+7.41%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
484.91%6.07339.5511A 1C
+31.36%
+11.54%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
1160.15%3.617810.789A 1C 1D 1M
+15.79%
-30.36%
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
676.54%4.390212.3010A 1C 1D
+17.59%
-10.00%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.