Match Performance
Your Performance
38.68% of winner
Place:16 / 17
Match %:38.68%
Match Pts:1035.17
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:36.75%
Std Dev:8.8
Spread:33.0 pts
Hits:382A 130C 30D 22M 3NS 1P
Best:
50.82% (S29)
Worst:
17.84% (S19)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2676.00
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:94.91%
Std Dev:6.1
Spread:18.1 pts
Hits:491A 64C 8D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
81.93% (S7)
10%
55%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 1.8× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
35.99%
27 stages · 17.84% – 50.82%
Low HF(Technical)
47.98%
3 stages · 45.20% – 50.80%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
40.44%
14 stages · 28.26% – 50.82%
Medium(13-24 shots)
35.02%
11 stages · 17.84% – 49.27%
Long(25+ shots)
35.46%
5 stages · 23.93% – 44.00%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 16 | 32.02% | 2.1309 | 32.85 | 9A 10C 5D 1NS | +88.47% | -39.66% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 15 | 41.12% | 2.2518 | 55.51 | 23A 6C 2D 1M | +108.21% | -14.38% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 16 | 36.96% | 2.1555 | 25.98 | 10A 2C | +180.56% | +3.70% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 16 | 44.00% | 2.4446 | 52.36 | 22A 9C 1D 1NS | +91.37% | -15.79% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 16 | 38.30% | 2.2835 | 38.10 | 15A 7C 1D 1M | +106.50% | -20.91% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 15 | 37.53% | 2.0450 | 24.45 | 8A 3C 1D | +146.72% | -7.41% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Low | 16 | 47.95% | 1.9438 | 28.81 | 10A 2C | +94.66% | -6.67% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 15 | 37.85% | 2.3055 | 20.82 | 7A 4C 1D | +111.37% | -20.00% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 16 | 29.42% | 1.8839 | 19.64 | 7A 4C 1M | +109.61% | -38.33% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 16 | 33.51% | 2.5574 | 26.98 | 12A 6C 1D 1M | +110.12% | -29.59% | - | ||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Med | 17 | 28.26% | 2.1300 | 18.31 | 8A 3C 1M | +165.36% | -25.00% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 16 | 46.18% | 2.3343 | 42.84 | 18A 3C 1D | +104.29% | -5.66% | - | ||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 17 | 37.96% | 2.1859 | 36.14 | 18A 3C 2M | +80.97% | -31.30% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 17 | 49.77% | 3.1008 | 15.48 | 8A 2C 2D | +66.27% | -17.24% | - | ||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 17 | 23.93% | 1.6890 | 46.18 | 22A 2C 2D 4M | +126.37% | -45.83% | - | ||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Med | 16 | 33.82% | 2.0146 | 63.04 | 23A 7C 1D 1M | +147.02% | -16.45% | - | ||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Low | 16 | 50.80% | 2.4942 | 21.65 | 9A 3C | +77.17% | -10.00% | - | ||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 16 | 20.87% | 1.2360 | 33.98 | 12A 4C 2M 1P | +134.02% | -51.16% | - | ||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Med | 16 | 17.84% | 1.1028 | 56.22 | 12A 6C 4D 2M | +234.24% | -40.38% | - | ||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 17 | 24.70% | 1.3302 | 50.37 | 17A 4C 2M 1NS | +153.50% | -37.38% | - | ||
Stage 21 Stage 21 Low | 16 | 45.20% | 2.1968 | 21.85 | 7A 4C 1D | +96.67% | -11.11% | - | ||
Stage 22 Stage 22 Med | 17 | 38.50% | 2.4812 | 35.87 | 18A 2C 3D 1M | +110.13% | -19.09% | - | ||
Stage 23 Stage 23 Med | 17 | 49.27% | 2.9421 | 33.31 | 14A 9C 1D | +74.49% | -14.04% | - | ||
Stage 24 Stage 24 Med | 15 | 38.44% | 2.0157 | 20.34 | 9A 2C 1M | +90.45% | -26.79% | - | ||
Stage 25 Stage 25 Med | 17 | 33.69% | 2.7156 | 39.77 | 20A 9C 1D 2M | +113.70% | -28.00% | - | ||
Stage 26 Stage 26 Med | 16 | 33.93% | 1.9174 | 27.12 | 8A 4C | +173.66% | -7.14% | - | ||
Stage 27 Stage 27 Med | 15 | 48.55% | 3.0769 | 17.55 | 10A 1C 1D | +105.99% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 28 Stage 28 Med | 17 | 43.07% | 3.0804 | 17.53 | 10A 1C 1D | +141.13% | +3.85% | - | ||
Stage 29 Stage 29 Med | 13 | 50.82% | 3.0570 | 17.01 | 8A 4C | +82.71% | -7.14% | - | ||
Stage 30 Stage 30 Med | 17 | 36.12% | 2.0717 | 25.10 | 8A 4C | +139.96% | -13.33% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.