Karol Sieczka

Extreme Euro Open 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
62.83% of winner
Place:12 / 17
Match %:62.83%
Match Pts:1681.25
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:59.57%
Std Dev:9.2
Spread:37.5 pts
Hits:415A 119C 23D 7M 1NS
Best:
75.65% (S28)
Worst:
38.12% (S24)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2676.00
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:94.91%
Std Dev:6.1
Spread:18.1 pts
Hits:491A 64C 8D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
81.93% (S7)
30%
65%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 2.1× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
59.06%
27 stages · 38.12% – 75.65%
Low HF(Technical)
67.11%
3 stages · 62.59% – 71.50%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
63.16%
14 stages · 38.12% – 75.65%
Medium(13-24 shots)
56.42%
11 stages · 44.23% – 68.32%
Long(25+ shots)
60.54%
5 stages · 54.80% – 67.91%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
1158.84%3.915726.5617A 6C 1D
+52.38%
-10.34%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
1254.80%3.001144.6521A 9C 2D
+67.48%
-8.22%
-
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
1168.14%3.973513.599A 3C
+46.76%
0.00%
-
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
1263.34%3.518639.2221A 11C
+43.35%
-9.21%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
1168.32%4.073224.0613A 11C
+30.41%
-10.91%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Med
1258.15%3.168816.419A 2C 1D
+65.59%
-3.70%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Low
1267.23%2.725419.088A 4C
+28.92%
-13.33%
-
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
673.25%4.462212.5510A 2C
+27.41%
-6.67%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
573.93%4.733711.8311A 1D
+26.25%
-6.67%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
1167.61%5.160617.4416A 3C 1D
+35.83%
-8.16%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Med
868.93%5.194810.7810A 2C
+56.23%
+7.69%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
1744.99%2.274230.7816A 3C 1D 2M
+46.78%
-33.96%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
1450.14%2.887532.9015A 6C 2D
+64.75%
-17.39%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Med
767.07%4.178713.8811A 1C
+49.09%
0.00%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
1455.12%3.890632.9021A 7C 2D
+61.27%
-11.11%
-
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
767.91%4.045032.8826A 4C 1D 1M
+28.84%
-12.50%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Low
1262.59%3.073015.628A 2C 2D
+27.82%
-20.00%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
1255.05%3.260423.3112A 5C 1D
+60.54%
-11.63%
-
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
661.80%3.821227.7417A 7C
+64.92%
+1.92%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
1251.93%2.796330.0420A 1C 1D 1M 1NS
+51.18%
-21.50%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Low
1071.50%3.475116.6911A 1C
+50.23%
+7.41%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Med
1644.23%2.849927.7213A 7C 3D 1M
+62.39%
-28.18%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
1167.52%4.032327.2819A 5C
+42.90%
-3.51%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
1638.12%1.998919.014A 5C 3D
+78.00%
-32.14%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
1261.21%4.933330.0026A 6C
+61.20%
-1.33%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
1446.84%2.646915.4910A 1D 1M
+56.31%
-26.79%
-
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
1645.91%2.909820.6212A
+142.02%
+11.11%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
675.65%5.41089.989A 3C
+37.28%
+3.85%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
1549.34%2.967614.4910A 1C 1M
+55.64%
-23.21%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
1163.52%3.643515.3710A 2C
+46.94%
-6.67%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.