David Cumming

Extreme Euro Open 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
56.84% of winner
Place:14 / 17
Match %:56.84%
Match Pts:1521.08
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:53.90%
Std Dev:8.1
Spread:45.0 pts
Hits:473A 82C 6D 3M 2NS
Best:
67.23% (S5)
Worst:
22.24% (S29)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2676.00
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:94.91%
Std Dev:6.1
Spread:18.1 pts
Hits:491A 64C 8D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
81.93% (S7)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 2.5× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
53.88%
27 stages · 22.24% – 67.23%
Low HF(Technical)
54.22%
3 stages · 43.31% – 64.13%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
54.41%
14 stages · 22.24% – 66.43%
Medium(13-24 shots)
53.86%
11 stages · 39.33% – 67.23%
Long(25+ shots)
53.42%
5 stages · 49.31% – 60.02%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
1357.44%3.822529.3020A 4C
+68.10%
-3.45%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
1349.31%2.700345.1826A 4C 2M
+69.47%
-16.44%
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
1357.42%3.348717.3211A 1C
+87.04%
+7.41%
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
1555.11%3.061447.6925A 7C
+74.31%
-3.95%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
1367.23%4.008328.9422A 2C
+56.86%
+5.45%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Med
1456.61%3.084819.4512A
+96.27%
+11.11%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Low
1464.13%2.599722.3111A 1C
+50.74%
-3.33%
-
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
1166.43%4.046712.858A 4C
+30.46%
-13.33%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
1160.10%3.848615.5912A
+66.38%
0.00%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
1265.78%5.020519.5219A 1C
+52.02%
0.00%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Med
1353.92%4.063213.299A 3C
+92.61%
+3.85%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
1448.03%2.428133.3619A 2C 1M 1NS
+59.08%
-23.58%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
1057.40%3.305532.3719A 4C
+62.09%
-6.96%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Med
1258.33%3.634216.5112A
+77.34%
+3.45%
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
1260.02%4.236533.9927A 3C
+66.62%
0.00%
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
1450.01%2.978444.9922A 7C 3D
+76.29%
-11.84%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Low
1555.21%2.710819.929A 3C
+63.01%
-10.00%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
1354.03%3.200026.2515A 3C
+80.79%
-2.33%
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
1439.33%2.432041.9421A 2C 1D 1NS
+149.35%
-1.92%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
1350.61%2.725138.5318A 5C
+93.91%
-1.87%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Low
1743.31%2.105325.659A 3C
+130.87%
0.00%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Med
1549.56%3.194034.4419A 5C
+101.76%
0.00%
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
1557.40%3.427932.0919A 5C
+68.10%
-3.51%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
1262.20%3.261517.1710A 2C
+60.77%
0.00%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
1353.05%4.276234.6126A 6C
+85.98%
-1.33%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
1249.16%2.777820.1610A 2C
+103.43%
0.00%
-
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
1742.41%2.687721.5811A 1C
+153.29%
+7.41%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
1357.35%4.101814.1411A 1C
+94.50%
+11.54%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
1722.24%1.337640.3710A 1C 1D
+333.62%
-3.57%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
1555.31%3.172817.6511A 1D
+68.74%
-6.67%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.