Lester Pocdalen

Extreme Euro Open 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
61.49% of winner
Place:13 / 17
Match %:61.49%
Match Pts:1645.38
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:58.42%
Std Dev:13.2
Spread:45.9 pts
Hits:415A 102C 25D 22M 1NS
Best:
80.62% (S24)
Worst:
34.75% (S19)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2676.00
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:94.91%
Std Dev:6.1
Spread:18.1 pts
Hits:491A 64C 8D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
81.93% (S7)
30%
65%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 2.5× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
57.44%
27 stages · 34.75% – 80.62%
Low HF(Technical)
72.92%
3 stages · 66.60% – 76.73%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
63.56%
14 stages · 36.45% – 80.62%
Medium(13-24 shots)
53.43%
11 stages · 34.75% – 79.57%
Long(25+ shots)
60.53%
5 stages · 44.44% – 78.24%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
1061.62%4.100922.1916A 7C 1M
+27.31%
-21.55%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
1444.44%2.433937.8020A 6C 4D 2M 1NS
+41.79%
-36.99%
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
1545.94%2.679213.817A 4C 1M
+49.14%
-31.48%
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
578.24%4.346634.5127A 5C
+26.13%
-1.32%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
1455.86%3.330523.4218A 2C 2D 2M
+26.94%
-29.09%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Med
1636.45%1.986027.1910A 1C 1D
+174.37%
0.00%
Stage 7
Stage 7
Low
1075.42%3.057518.9711A 1C
+28.18%
-3.33%
-
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
869.49%4.232813.2310A 2C
+34.31%
-6.67%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
672.58%4.647312.0510A 2C
+28.60%
-6.67%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
1453.55%4.087015.1715A 2C 1D 2M
+18.15%
-36.73%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Med
1641.97%3.163012.339A 1C 1D 1M
+78.70%
-25.00%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
1256.56%2.859228.3315A 5C 1D 1M
+35.10%
-23.58%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
764.39%3.708025.6215A 6C 2D
+28.29%
-17.39%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Med
866.03%4.113514.1011A 1C
+51.45%
0.00%
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
1356.49%3.987525.5821A 5C 2D 2M
+25.39%
-29.17%
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
1350.77%3.023937.7024A 4C 2D 2M
+47.73%
-25.00%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Low
1066.60%3.270013.1510A 1C 1M
+7.61%
-28.33%
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
1550.91%3.015522.5510A 5C 3D
+55.30%
-20.93%
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
1534.75%2.148836.3017A 4C 1D 2M
+115.81%
-25.00%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
1538.28%2.061444.6318A 4C 1M
+124.61%
-14.02%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Low
776.73%3.729314.489A 3C
+30.33%
0.00%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Med
1451.14%3.295322.7611A 9C 3D 1M
+33.33%
-31.82%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
1651.51%3.075827.9620A 2C 2M
+46.46%
-24.56%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
680.62%4.227413.7211A 1C
+28.46%
+3.57%
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
872.48%5.841824.6525A 6C 1D
+32.46%
-4.00%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
1546.45%2.624815.6210A 1D 1M
+57.62%
-26.79%
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
779.57%5.043511.5011A 1C
+34.98%
+7.41%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
1069.04%4.93839.726A 6C
+33.70%
-7.69%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
873.04%4.393711.387A 5C
+22.23%
-10.71%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
869.49%3.986314.5511A 1C
+39.10%
-3.33%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.