Match Performance
Your Performance
46.14% of winner
Place:15 / 17
Match %:46.14%
Match Pts:1234.76
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:43.83%
Std Dev:13.2
Spread:47.9 pts
Hits:339A 156C 33D 36M 1NS 1P
Best:
62.34% (S6)
Worst:
14.42% (S19)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2676.00
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:94.91%
Std Dev:6.1
Spread:18.1 pts
Hits:491A 64C 8D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
81.93% (S7)
10%
55%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 2.7× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
43.76%
27 stages · 14.42% – 62.34%
Low HF(Technical)
44.85%
3 stages · 27.09% – 58.83%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
43.91%
14 stages · 26.49% – 62.34%
Medium(13-24 shots)
44.78%
11 stages · 14.42% – 59.81%
Long(25+ shots)
42.30%
5 stages · 26.05% – 58.05%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 15 | 37.24% | 2.4787 | 25.82 | 10A 11C 1D 2M | +48.14% | -44.83% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 16 | 35.49% | 1.9436 | 42.19 | 20A 7C 1D 4M | +58.25% | -43.84% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 14 | 52.98% | 3.0897 | 16.83 | 9A 2C 1D | +81.75% | -3.70% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 14 | 58.05% | 3.2250 | 40.00 | 24A 6C 1D 1M | +46.20% | -15.13% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 15 | 50.57% | 3.0152 | 30.18 | 16A 7C 1M | +63.58% | -17.27% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 11 | 62.34% | 3.3967 | 14.72 | 8A 3C 1D | +48.54% | -7.41% | |||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Low | 15 | 58.83% | 2.3852 | 22.64 | 10A 1C 1D | +52.97% | -10.00% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 16 | 31.73% | 1.9331 | 13.45 | 8A 2C 2M | +36.55% | -56.67% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 15 | 46.04% | 2.9478 | 13.23 | 8A 3C 1M | +41.20% | -35.00% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 15 | 53.20% | 4.0606 | 18.47 | 15A 3C 1D 1M | +43.85% | -23.47% | - | ||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Med | 15 | 42.58% | 3.2086 | 13.09 | 5A 5C 2D | +89.71% | -19.23% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 15 | 46.86% | 2.3687 | 38.84 | 14A 7C 1D | +85.22% | -13.21% | - | ||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 16 | 45.82% | 2.6384 | 30.70 | 11A 7C 5D | +53.73% | -29.57% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 16 | 56.18% | 3.4997 | 15.43 | 9A 3C | +65.74% | -6.90% | - | ||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 15 | 47.35% | 3.3425 | 32.61 | 18A 9C 2D 1M | +59.85% | -24.31% | |||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Med | 17 | 26.05% | 1.5516 | 37.38 | 16A 8C 4D 4M 1P | +46.47% | -61.84% | - | ||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Low | 17 | 27.09% | 1.3301 | 16.54 | 7A 2C 1D 2M | +35.35% | -63.33% | |||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 17 | 15.21% | 0.9009 | 21.09 | 6A 5C 4D 3M | +45.25% | -77.91% | |||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Med | 17 | 14.42% | 0.8913 | 40.39 | 14A 5C 1D 4M 1NS | +140.13% | -65.38% | - | ||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 10 | 58.94% | 3.1741 | 32.45 | 17A 6C | +63.31% | -3.74% | - | ||
Stage 21 Stage 21 Low | 15 | 48.63% | 2.3636 | 16.50 | 8A 3C 1M | +48.51% | -27.78% | - | ||
Stage 22 Stage 22 Med | 11 | 53.69% | 3.4599 | 26.59 | 11A 12C 1D | +55.77% | -16.36% | - | ||
Stage 23 Stage 23 Med | 14 | 59.81% | 3.5714 | 26.04 | 17A 6C 1M | +36.41% | -18.42% | - | ||
Stage 24 Stage 24 Med | 17 | 26.49% | 1.3889 | 14.40 | 5A 5C 2M | +34.83% | -64.29% | - | ||
Stage 25 Stage 25 Med | 16 | 44.87% | 3.6166 | 27.65 | 17A 11C 2D 2M | +48.58% | -33.33% | - | ||
Stage 26 Stage 26 Med | 17 | 30.66% | 1.7323 | 19.05 | 6A 4C 1D 1M | +92.23% | -41.07% | |||
Stage 27 Stage 27 Med | 13 | 56.62% | 3.5887 | 14.49 | 8A 4C | +70.07% | -3.70% | - | ||
Stage 28 Stage 28 Med | 14 | 54.74% | 3.9157 | 9.96 | 8A 3C 1M | +37.00% | -25.00% | - | ||
Stage 29 Stage 29 Med | 16 | 33.19% | 1.9961 | 15.53 | 6A 3C 2D 1M | +66.81% | -44.64% | - | ||
Stage 30 Stage 30 Med | 16 | 43.25% | 2.4809 | 15.72 | 8A 3C 1M | +50.29% | -35.00% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.