Edrick Eliseo Chan

Extreme Euro Open 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
95.35% of winner
Place:2 / 17
Match %:95.35%
Match Pts:2551.63
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:90.52%
Std Dev:11.2
Spread:46.8 pts
Hits:439A 106C 15D 4M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S4)
Worst:
53.24% (S9)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2676.00
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:94.91%
Std Dev:6.1
Spread:18.1 pts
Hits:491A 64C 8D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
81.93% (S7)
50%
75%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 2.6× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
90.17%
27 stages · 53.24% – 100.00%
Low HF(Technical)
95.67%
3 stages · 90.17% – 100.00%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
86.66%
14 stages · 53.24% – 100.00%
Medium(13-24 shots)
90.17%
11 stages · 71.14% – 100.00%
Long(25+ shots)
95.14%
5 stages · 90.15% – 100.00%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
680.32%5.345316.6516A 6C 1D 1M
-4.48%
-23.28%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
293.78%5.135528.0425A 6C 1D
+5.18%
-1.37%
-
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
1266.19%3.860011.1410A 1C 1M
+20.30%
-20.37%
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
1100.00%5.555627.3628A 4C
0.00%
0.00%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
493.18%5.555618.0016A 6C 2D
-2.44%
-9.09%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Med
1100.00%5.44909.9110A 1C 1D
0.00%
0.00%
Stage 7
Stage 7
Low
290.17%3.655415.3210A 2C
+3.51%
-6.67%
-
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
1100.00%6.09149.8512A
0.00%
0.00%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
1453.24%3.40919.686A 4C 1D 1M
+3.31%
-45.00%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
683.33%6.360414.1515A 5C
+10.20%
-8.16%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Med
1100.00%7.53626.909A 2C 1D
0.00%
0.00%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
395.11%4.807720.8017A 5C
-0.81%
-5.66%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
471.14%4.096521.9718A 3C 1D 1M
+10.02%
-21.74%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Med
381.40%5.07109.868A 3C 1D
+5.91%
-13.79%
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
391.53%6.460721.3624A 6C
+4.71%
-4.17%
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
290.15%5.369625.7022A 9C 1D
+0.71%
-9.21%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Low
296.83%4.754112.2011A 1C
-0.16%
-3.33%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
1100.00%5.922914.5216A 2C
0.00%
0.00%
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
1100.00%6.183116.8216A 8C
0.00%
0.00%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
479.63%4.288222.6220A 2C 1D 1NS
+13.84%
-9.35%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Low
1100.00%4.860511.119A 3C
0.00%
0.00%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Med
298.01%6.315818.0521A 3C
+5.74%
+3.64%
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
295.79%5.720019.9321A 3C
+4.40%
0.00%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
585.27%4.471211.639A 2C 1D
+8.90%
-7.14%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
1100.00%8.060218.6127A 5C
0.00%
0.00%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
965.81%3.718712.377A 3C 2D
+24.82%
-17.86%
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
1100.00%6.33808.529A 3C
0.00%
0.00%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
1100.00%7.15277.279A 2C 1D
0.00%
0.00%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
1100.00%6.01509.3110A 2C
0.00%
0.00%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
774.37%4.265812.198A 4C
+16.54%
-13.33%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.