ANTONIO CASES BARDAVIO

Extreme Euro Open 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
63.12% of winner
Place:11 / 17
Match %:63.12%
Match Pts:1689.19
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:59.90%
Std Dev:8.6
Spread:34.8 pts
Hits:460A 93C 6D 5M 1NS
Best:
74.23% (S5)
Worst:
39.39% (S19)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2676.00
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:94.91%
Std Dev:6.1
Spread:18.1 pts
Hits:491A 64C 8D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
81.93% (S7)
30%
65%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 1.9× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
59.51%
27 stages · 39.39% – 74.23%
Low HF(Technical)
65.70%
3 stages · 60.97% – 70.19%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
64.00%
14 stages · 47.48% – 73.76%
Medium(13-24 shots)
56.63%
11 stages · 39.39% – 74.23%
Long(25+ shots)
60.51%
5 stages · 48.05% – 65.71%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
1258.68%3.905426.6316A 8C
+52.78%
-10.34%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
1065.71%3.598337.2421A 9C 2D
+39.68%
-8.22%
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
973.76%4.301113.0210A 2C
+40.60%
+3.70%
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
1165.04%3.613340.9626A 6C
+49.71%
-2.63%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
974.23%4.425525.7621A 3C
+39.62%
+3.64%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Med
1357.48%3.132317.249A 3C
+73.97%
0.00%
Stage 7
Stage 7
Low
1365.93%2.673020.9510A 2C
+41.55%
-6.67%
-
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
1068.21%4.154713.9611A 1C
+41.73%
-3.33%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
964.54%4.132813.5510A 2C
+44.61%
-6.67%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
1359.76%4.560817.7617A 2C 1M
+38.32%
-17.35%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Med
1158.49%4.408212.259A 3C
+77.54%
+3.85%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
1059.35%3.000335.3320A 2C
+68.48%
0.00%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
1154.27%3.125033.6018A 5C
+68.25%
-8.70%
Stage 14
Stage 14
Med
1556.65%3.529415.309A 3C
+64.34%
-6.90%
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
1160.36%4.260433.8027A 3C
+65.69%
0.00%
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
1548.05%2.861848.5728A 3C 1M
+90.32%
-8.55%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Low
1360.97%2.993717.378A 4C
+42.14%
-13.33%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
1453.84%3.189222.8916A 1C 1M
+57.64%
-15.12%
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
1339.39%2.435541.0620A 3C 1D 1NS
+144.11%
-3.85%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
1446.02%2.478237.9319A 3C 1M
+90.89%
-12.15%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Low
1170.19%3.411817.0011A 1C
+53.02%
+7.41%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Med
1351.88%3.343127.2217A 5C 1D 1M
+59.46%
-17.27%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
1266.36%3.962527.7620A 3C 1D
+45.42%
-3.51%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
1071.34%3.740814.9710A 2C
+40.17%
0.00%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
1163.39%5.109029.3627A 5C
+57.76%
0.00%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
1347.48%2.683117.897A 4C 1D
+80.52%
-14.29%
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
1260.13%3.810815.2211A 1C
+78.64%
+7.41%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
970.67%5.054811.8712A
+63.27%
+15.38%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
971.94%4.326912.489A 3C
+34.05%
-3.57%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
1358.38%3.348717.3211A 1C
+65.58%
-3.33%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.