Michal Koronkiewicz

Extreme Euro Open 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
81.39% of winner
Place:5 / 17
Match %:81.39%
Match Pts:2177.97
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:77.29%
Std Dev:8.9
Spread:35.5 pts
Hits:457A 90C 10D 7M
Best:
92.06% (S27)
Worst:
56.58% (S19)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2676.00
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:94.91%
Std Dev:6.1
Spread:18.1 pts
Hits:491A 64C 8D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
81.93% (S7)
50%
75%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 2.0× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
77.21%
27 stages · 56.58% – 92.06%
Low HF(Technical)
78.38%
3 stages · 74.81% – 83.86%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
78.56%
14 stages · 64.15% – 91.69%
Medium(13-24 shots)
74.08%
11 stages · 56.58% – 92.06%
Long(25+ shots)
80.80%
5 stages · 77.06% – 83.39%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
484.86%5.647520.5422A 2C
+17.84%
0.00%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
383.39%4.567029.5626A 5C 1M
+10.88%
-7.53%
-
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
581.13%4.730812.2611A 1C
+32.40%
+7.41%
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
678.08%4.338030.8921A 9C 2D
+12.90%
-11.84%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
679.75%4.754819.9819A 3C 1D 1M
+8.29%
-13.64%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Med
774.47%4.057711.0911A 1M
+11.91%
-16.67%
Stage 7
Stage 7
Low
583.86%3.399817.0611A 1C
+15.27%
-3.33%
-
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
577.22%4.703811.489A 3C
+16.55%
-10.00%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
386.68%5.550410.8112A
+15.37%
0.00%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
386.31%6.587214.2718A 1C 1D
+11.14%
-4.08%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Med
582.93%6.25008.9610A 2C
+29.86%
+7.69%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
1159.11%2.987728.4516A 5C 1M
+35.67%
-19.81%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
959.99%3.454527.5013A 10C
+37.71%
-17.39%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Med
1064.15%3.996310.7610A 1C 1M
+15.57%
-25.86%
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
482.75%5.841322.9422A 8C
+12.45%
-6.94%
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
482.84%4.934230.4027A 5C
+19.12%
-1.32%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Low
876.46%3.754311.727A 2C 3D
-4.09%
-26.67%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
581.79%4.844317.3415A 3C
+19.42%
-2.33%
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
956.58%3.498524.0119A 3C 2M
+42.75%
-19.23%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
766.86%3.600329.7219A 4C
+49.57%
0.00%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Low
874.81%3.636415.9511A 1C
+43.56%
+7.41%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Med
876.42%4.924821.9319A 4C 1D
+28.47%
-1.82%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
680.45%4.804023.7321A 3C
+24.31%
0.00%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
291.69%4.807712.4812A
+16.85%
+7.14%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
477.06%6.211224.1527A 5C
+29.77%
0.00%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
869.15%3.907413.829A 3C
+39.46%
-3.57%
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
392.06%5.83509.9411A 1C
+16.67%
+7.41%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
775.65%5.41089.9810A 1C 1D
+37.28%
+3.85%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
682.10%4.938310.539A 2C 1D
+13.10%
-7.14%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
479.57%4.564012.2710A 2C
+17.30%
-6.67%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.