Match Performance
Your Performance
92.08% of winner
Place:3 / 17
Match %:92.08%
Match Pts:2463.99
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:87.38%
Std Dev:7.3
Spread:26.9 pts
Hits:495A 62C 3D 4M
Best:
100.00% (S12)
Worst:
73.14% (S20)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2676.00
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:94.91%
Std Dev:6.1
Spread:18.1 pts
Hits:491A 64C 8D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
81.93% (S7)
70%
85%
100%
You Winner Avg
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
86.84%
27 stages · 73.14% – 100.00%
Low HF(Technical)
95.28%
3 stages · 89.98% – 100.00%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
91.29%
14 stages · 83.38% – 100.00%
Medium(13-24 shots)
89.30%
11 stages · 73.14% – 100.00%
Long(25+ shots)
80.28%
5 stages · 77.05% – 83.74%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 2 | 88.11% | 5.8642 | 19.44 | 21A 3C | +11.53% | -1.72% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 4 | 80.17% | 4.3902 | 30.75 | 27A 3C 1D 1M | +15.34% | -7.53% | |||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 2 | 98.19% | 5.7260 | 9.78 | 10A 2C | +5.62% | +3.70% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 4 | 82.66% | 4.5922 | 31.14 | 30A 1C 1M | +13.82% | -5.92% | |||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 2 | 96.51% | 5.7540 | 20.16 | 22A 2C | +9.27% | +5.45% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 4 | 93.09% | 5.0725 | 11.04 | 10A 2C | +11.40% | +3.70% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Low | 3 | 89.98% | 3.6478 | 15.90 | 11A 1C | +7.43% | -3.33% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 3 | 85.88% | 5.2310 | 11.47 | 12A | +16.45% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 2 | 87.54% | 5.6056 | 9.99 | 10A 2C | +6.62% | -6.67% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 2 | 86.58% | 6.6082 | 14.83 | 19A 1C | +15.50% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Med | 4 | 83.38% | 6.2839 | 9.23 | 11A 1C | +33.77% | +11.54% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 1 | 100.00% | 5.0548 | 20.97 | 20A 2C | 0.00% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 2 | 92.91% | 5.3504 | 21.12 | 22A 1C | +5.76% | -1.74% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 2 | 92.87% | 5.7859 | 10.37 | 12A | +11.39% | +3.45% | - | ||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 5 | 77.63% | 5.4801 | 22.81 | 24A 5C 1M | +11.81% | -13.19% | |||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Med | 3 | 83.74% | 4.9879 | 28.87 | 25A 6C 1D | +13.13% | -5.26% | - | ||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Low | 1 | 100.00% | 4.9100 | 12.22 | 12A | 0.00% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 4 | 85.66% | 5.0737 | 16.95 | 16A 2C | +16.74% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Med | 3 | 83.72% | 5.1763 | 22.41 | 22A 2C | +33.23% | +11.54% | - | ||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 6 | 73.14% | 3.9387 | 28.69 | 22A 1C | +44.39% | +5.61% | - | ||
Stage 21 Stage 21 Low | 2 | 95.85% | 4.6589 | 12.02 | 10A 2C | +8.19% | +3.70% | |||
Stage 22 Stage 22 Med | 1 | 100.00% | 6.4441 | 17.07 | 19A 5C | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 23 Stage 23 Med | 5 | 86.38% | 5.1582 | 20.55 | 18A 5C 1D | +7.65% | -7.02% | - | ||
Stage 24 Stage 24 Med | 4 | 89.24% | 4.6794 | 11.54 | 9A 3C | +8.05% | -3.57% | - | ||
Stage 25 Stage 25 Med | 5 | 77.05% | 6.2103 | 22.06 | 27A 4C 1M | +18.54% | -8.67% | - | ||
Stage 26 Stage 26 Med | 2 | 95.93% | 5.4211 | 10.33 | 10A 2C | +4.24% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 27 Stage 27 Med | 4 | 87.65% | 5.5556 | 10.44 | 11A 1C | +22.54% | +7.41% | - | ||
Stage 28 Stage 28 Med | 3 | 87.95% | 6.2907 | 9.22 | 11A 1C | +26.82% | +11.54% | - | ||
Stage 29 Stage 29 Med | 3 | 88.71% | 5.3358 | 10.87 | 11A 1C | +16.76% | +3.57% | |||
Stage 30 Stage 30 Med | 2 | 89.48% | 5.1327 | 11.30 | 11A 1C | +8.03% | -3.33% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.