Match Performance
Your Performance
17.21% of winner
Place:4 / 4
Match %:17.21%
Match Pts:188.06
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:33.58%
Std Dev:4.9
Spread:12.7 pts
Hits:111A 1C 1NS
Best:
38.96% (S2)
Worst:
26.22% (S4)
Division Winner
Sebastian Fedorowicz
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:1092.47
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:99.32%
Std Dev:2.0
Spread:6.8 pts
Hits:158A 52C 10D 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
93.15% (S8)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 1.9× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
33.74%
5 stages · 26.22% – 38.96%
Low HF(Technical)
32.24%
1 stage · 32.24%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
31.36%
2 stages · 30.48% – 32.24%
Medium(13-24 shots)
37.53%
3 stages · 34.83% – 38.96%
Long(25+ shots)
26.22%
1 stage · 26.22%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 4 | 30.48% | 2.9197 | 20.55 | 12A | +245.38% | +5.26% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 4 | 38.96% | 2.5940 | 46.26 | 24A | +185.20% | +11.11% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 4 | 34.83% | 2.5515 | 30.57 | 15A 1C | +190.87% | +1.30% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 4 | 26.22% | 1.6105 | 74.51 | 26A 1NS | +281.32% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Low | 4 | 32.24% | 1.4767 | 40.63 | 12A | +210.15% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 4 | 37.93% | 3.4733 | 31.67 | 22A | +184.29% | +7.84% | |||
Stage 7 Stage 7 | - | - | - | - | 2A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 8 Stage 8 | - | - | - | - | 2A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 9 Stage 9 | - | - | - | - | 2A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 10 Stage 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 11 Stage 11 | - | - | - | - | 4A | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 12 Stage 12 | - | - | - | - | 2A | - | - | - | - | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.