Match Performance
Your Performance
85.34% of winner
Place:3 / 7
Match %:85.34%
Match Pts:469.49
Consistency:Inconsistent
Avg:77.85%
Std Dev:28.3
Spread:73.0 pts
Hits:103A 10C 5M 1NS 2P
Best:
100.00% (S3)
Worst:
26.99% (S1)
Division Winner
Mariusz Pacześ
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:550.13
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:93.46%
Std Dev:6.5
Spread:15.5 pts
Hits:92A 25C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
84.49% (S2)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 4.7× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
High HF(Speed)
96.65%
1 stage · 96.65%
Medium HF(Balanced)
75.80%
5 stages · 26.99% – 100.00%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
96.65%
1 stage · 96.65%
Medium(13-24 shots)
88.12%
3 stages · 81.88% – 92.31%
Long(25+ shots)
64.75%
2 stages · 26.99% – 100.00%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 7 | 26.99% | 1.5015 | 19.98 | 20A 4M 1NS 2P | +2.94% | -72.22% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 2 | 92.31% | 7.4180 | 14.02 | 19A 3C | +4.32% | -3.70% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 1 | 100.00% | 6.5383 | 22.33 | 28A 2C | 0.00% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 2 | 88.21% | 7.1357 | 9.95 | 13A 2C | +16.65% | +2.90% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 3 | 81.88% | 4.5741 | 12.68 | 13A 1C 1M | -0.24% | -18.31% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 High | 2 | 96.65% | 9.8418 | 5.69 | 10A 2C | +15.89% | +12.00% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.