Match Performance
Your Performance
56.35% of winner
Place:10 / 14
Match %:56.35%
Match Pts:843.63
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:55.68%
Std Dev:11.2
Spread:45.0 pts
Hits:860A 272C 72D 8M
Best:
73.08% (S8)
Worst:
28.03% (S12)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:1497.03
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:98.81%
Std Dev:2.8
Spread:9.4 pts
Hits:1024A 168C 20D
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
90.61% (S14)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 4.8× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
56.40%
24 stages · 39.67% – 69.92%
Low HF(Technical)
55.07%
40 stages · 28.03% – 73.08%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
50.79%
32 stages · 28.03% – 69.92%
Medium(13-24 shots)
55.95%
24 stages · 39.67% – 73.08%
Long(25+ shots)
62.34%
8 stages · 59.47% – 65.21%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 10 | 69.88% | 3.2787 | 17.69 | 11A 1C | +53.69% | +7.41% | - | ||
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 10 | 69.88% | 3.2787 | 17.69 | 11A 1C | +53.69% | +7.41% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 15 | 39.67% | 2.7312 | 27.46 | 12A 7C 4D 1M | +65.82% | -34.21% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 15 | 39.67% | 2.7312 | 27.46 | 12A 7C 4D 1M | +65.82% | -34.21% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Low | 11 | 42.84% | 1.8614 | 31.16 | 11A 1C | +125.63% | -3.33% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Low | 11 | 42.84% | 1.8614 | 31.16 | 11A 1C | +125.63% | -3.33% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 10 | 60.08% | 3.2768 | 35.40 | 22A 2C | +66.43% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 10 | 60.08% | 3.2768 | 35.40 | 22A 2C | +66.43% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Low | 13 | 55.54% | 2.7093 | 36.91 | 15A 8C 1D | +60.76% | -10.71% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Low | 13 | 55.54% | 2.7093 | 36.91 | 15A 8C 1D | +60.76% | -10.71% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Low | 10 | 47.69% | 2.0091 | 26.38 | 10A 1C | +126.83% | +8.16% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Low | 10 | 47.69% | 2.0091 | 26.38 | 10A 1C | +126.83% | +8.16% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 9 | 69.92% | 4.1379 | 13.05 | 9A 3C | +33.16% | -6.90% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 9 | 69.92% | 4.1379 | 13.05 | 9A 3C | +33.16% | -6.90% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Low | 7 | 73.08% | 2.6441 | 40.09 | 18A 5C 1D | +27.23% | -7.02% | |||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Low | 7 | 73.08% | 2.6441 | 40.09 | 18A 5C 1D | +27.23% | -7.02% | |||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 11 | 65.21% | 3.6836 | 36.92 | 21A 10C 1D | +40.92% | -8.11% | |||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 11 | 65.21% | 3.6836 | 36.92 | 21A 10C 1D | +40.92% | -8.11% | |||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Low | 12 | 54.28% | 2.6567 | 18.82 | 9A 1C 2D | +58.82% | -13.79% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Low | 12 | 54.28% | 2.6567 | 18.82 | 9A 1C 2D | +58.82% | -13.79% | - | ||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Med | 13 | 47.08% | 3.0275 | 32.37 | 17A 3C 4D | +79.43% | -15.52% | - | ||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Med | 13 | 47.08% | 3.0275 | 32.37 | 17A 3C 4D | +79.43% | -15.52% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Low | 14 | 28.03% | 0.9028 | 43.20 | 8A 3C 1M | +148.42% | -30.36% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Low | 14 | 28.03% | 0.9028 | 43.20 | 8A 3C 1M | +148.42% | -30.36% | - | ||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Low | 13 | 44.43% | 1.9483 | 23.61 | 7A 3C 2D | +84.89% | -17.86% | - | ||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Low | 13 | 44.43% | 1.9483 | 23.61 | 7A 3C 2D | +84.89% | -17.86% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Low | 13 | 49.00% | 2.4249 | 18.97 | 6A 5C 1D | +61.86% | -20.69% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Low | 13 | 49.00% | 2.4249 | 18.97 | 6A 5C 1D | +61.86% | -20.69% | - | ||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 9 | 60.26% | 3.3053 | 33.28 | 19A 5C | +62.98% | -1.79% | - | ||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 9 | 60.26% | 3.3053 | 33.28 | 19A 5C | +62.98% | -1.79% | - | ||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Low | 11 | 59.47% | 2.8633 | 46.10 | 20A 10C 2D | +54.13% | -8.33% | - | ||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Low | 11 | 59.47% | 2.8633 | 46.10 | 20A 10C 2D | +54.13% | -8.33% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.