Karol Sieczka

AIRBASE OPEN Wiechlice 2026 HGClassic

Match Performance

Your Performance
66.44% of winner
Place:7 / 14
Match %:66.44%
Match Pts:994.67
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:65.66%
Std Dev:14.8
Spread:53.9 pts
Hits:916A 252C 28D 16M
Best:
85.59% (S4)
Worst:
31.71% (S3)
Division Winner
Jakub Marx
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:1497.03
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:98.81%
Std Dev:2.8
Spread:9.4 pts
Hits:1024A 168C 20D
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
90.61% (S14)
30%
65%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 5.7× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
65.68%
24 stages · 45.37% – 85.59%
Low HF(Technical)
65.63%
40 stages · 31.71% – 85.26%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
60.60%
32 stages · 31.71% – 80.13%
Medium(13-24 shots)
66.46%
24 stages · 45.37% – 85.59%
Long(25+ shots)
71.34%
8 stages · 67.97% – 74.72%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Low
677.36%3.629315.4310A 2C
+34.06%
+3.70%
-
Stage 1
Stage 1
Low
677.36%3.629315.4310A 2C
+34.06%
+3.70%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
1149.96%3.438925.8817A 4C 2D 1M
+56.28%
-21.93%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
1149.96%3.438925.8817A 4C 2D 1M
+56.28%
-21.93%
-
Stage 3
Stage 3
Low
1631.71%1.377729.769A 2C 1M
+115.50%
-31.67%
-
Stage 3
Stage 3
Low
1631.71%1.377729.769A 2C 1M
+115.50%
-31.67%
-
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
485.59%4.668024.8522A 2C
+16.83%
0.00%
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
485.59%4.668024.8522A 2C
+16.83%
0.00%
Stage 5
Stage 5
Low
385.26%4.159227.8922A 2C
+21.47%
+3.57%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Low
385.26%4.159227.8922A 2C
+21.47%
+3.57%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Low
1346.08%1.941321.126A 3C 2D
+81.60%
-16.33%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Low
1346.08%1.941321.126A 3C 2D
+81.60%
-16.33%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Med
380.13%4.742412.2311A 1C
+24.80%
0.00%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Med
380.13%4.742412.2311A 1C
+24.80%
0.00%
-
Stage 8
Stage 8
Low
970.06%2.534741.8217A 7C
+32.72%
-7.02%
Stage 8
Stage 8
Low
970.06%2.534741.8217A 7C
+32.72%
-7.02%
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
574.72%4.220733.1722A 10C
+26.60%
-5.41%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
574.72%4.220733.1722A 10C
+26.60%
-5.41%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Low
963.21%3.093918.1010A 2C
+52.74%
-3.45%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Low
963.21%3.093918.1010A 2C
+52.74%
-3.45%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Med
962.54%4.021228.3521A 3C
+57.15%
-1.72%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Med
962.54%4.021228.3521A 3C
+57.15%
-1.72%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Low
1147.13%1.517531.637A 4C 1D
+81.89%
-14.29%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Low
1147.13%1.517531.637A 4C 1D
+81.89%
-14.29%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Low
761.17%2.682620.1310A 1C 1D
+57.64%
-3.57%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Low
761.17%2.682620.1310A 1C 1D
+57.64%
-3.57%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Low
876.80%3.800512.636A 6C
+7.76%
-17.24%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Low
876.80%3.800512.636A 6C
+7.76%
-17.24%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
1545.37%2.488436.5716A 7C 1M
+79.09%
-18.75%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Med
1545.37%2.488436.5716A 7C 1M
+79.09%
-18.75%
-
Stage 16
Stage 16
Low
767.97%3.272438.8123A 7C 1D 1M
+29.76%
-11.81%
Stage 16
Stage 16
Low
767.97%3.272438.8123A 7C 1D 1M
+29.76%
-11.81%

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.