Match Performance
Your Performance
69.28% of winner
Place:3 / 6
Match %:69.28%
Match Pts:921.73
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:68.75%
Std Dev:13.7
Spread:55.6 pts
Hits:194A 58C 13D 2M
Best:
97.94% (S7)
Worst:
42.32% (S1)
Division Winner
Michał KORONKIEWICZ
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:1330.51
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:98.90%
Std Dev:3.0
Spread:13.5 pts
Hits:211A 50C 6D 2M
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
86.54% (S9)
40%
70%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 4.1× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
65.37%
16 stages · 42.32% – 84.63%
Low HF(Technical)
83.66%
4 stages · 69.37% – 97.94%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
70.24%
11 stages · 47.33% – 97.94%
Medium(13-24 shots)
67.45%
9 stages · 42.32% – 84.63%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 5 | 42.32% | 2.4184 | 17.78 | 7A 6C 1M | +53.94% | -34.85% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 5 | 52.05% | 2.7267 | 16.87 | 6A 5C 1D | +57.81% | -17.86% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 3 | 53.26% | 4.5510 | 16.26 | 13A 3C | +87.76% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 2 | 84.63% | 6.7257 | 11.30 | 14A 2C | +24.72% | +5.56% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 2 | 71.30% | 4.3498 | 22.30 | 17A 4C | +40.25% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 2 | 59.57% | 3.7763 | 13.77 | 9A 2C 1D | +50.49% | -10.34% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Low | 2 | 97.94% | 4.1280 | 9.69 | 8A | +2.11% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 4 | 47.33% | 2.8108 | 9.25 | 6A 2C 1M | +27.76% | -39.53% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Low | 4 | 76.85% | 3.3635 | 15.46 | 9A 2C 1D | +47.10% | +13.04% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 4 | 63.32% | 3.6601 | 15.30 | 10A | +47.40% | -6.67% | - | ||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Low | 4 | 69.37% | 3.2700 | 18.96 | 9A 5C 2D | +27.68% | -11.43% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 4 | 77.06% | 3.9520 | 19.99 | 14A 3C | +60.18% | +23.44% | - | ||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 5 | 58.95% | 4.9477 | 10.51 | 9A 2C 1D | +52.10% | -10.34% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 3 | 64.70% | 4.1779 | 14.84 | 11A 2C 1D | +40.93% | -8.82% | - | ||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 2 | 67.62% | 4.6382 | 10.78 | 6A 6C 2D | +15.54% | -21.88% | - | ||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Med | 3 | 71.27% | 4.3452 | 16.80 | 12A 4C 1D | +33.02% | -5.19% | - | ||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Med | 2 | 81.87% | 4.8598 | 10.70 | 9A 2C 1D | +22.15% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 4 | 69.28% | 4.2088 | 11.88 | 8A 3C 1D | +38.79% | -3.85% | - | ||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Low | 2 | 97.64% | 4.7417 | 11.81 | 10A 2C | +6.21% | +3.70% | - | ||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 4 | 66.41% | 4.2614 | 10.56 | 7A 3C 1D | +65.26% | +9.76% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.