Match Performance
Your Performance
73.72% of winner
Place:2 / 6
Match %:73.72%
Match Pts:980.79
Consistency:Variable
Avg:72.56%
Std Dev:20.8
Spread:75.4 pts
Hits:198A 57C 9D 3M 2NPM
Best:
100.00% (S9)
Worst:
24.56% (S7)
Division Winner
Michał KORONKIEWICZ
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:1330.51
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:98.90%
Std Dev:3.0
Spread:13.5 pts
Hits:211A 50C 6D 2M
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
86.54% (S9)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 5.6× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
71.18%
16 stages · 28.78% – 100.00%
Low HF(Technical)
78.66%
4 stages · 24.56% – 100.00%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
70.60%
11 stages · 24.56% – 100.00%
Medium(13-24 shots)
74.27%
9 stages · 42.21% – 100.00%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 2 | 68.94% | 3.9396 | 15.23 | 9A 5C | +31.86% | -9.09% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 4 | 60.72% | 3.1807 | 15.72 | 7A 5C | +47.05% | -10.71% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 2 | 57.46% | 4.9097 | 13.85 | 11A 4C 1D | +59.93% | -8.11% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 3 | 81.56% | 6.4815 | 10.80 | 12A 3C 1D | +19.21% | -2.78% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 4 | 56.19% | 3.4278 | 23.63 | 11A 8C 2D | +48.62% | -16.49% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 3 | 59.34% | 3.7618 | 15.95 | 12A | +74.32% | +3.45% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Low | 5 | 24.56% | 1.0352 | 24.15 | 7A 1M | +154.48% | -37.50% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 6 | 28.78% | 1.7094 | 15.21 | 6A 2C 1M | +110.08% | -39.53% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Low | 1 | 100.00% | 4.3768 | 10.51 | 8A 2C 2NPM | 0.00% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 1 | 100.00% | 5.7803 | 10.38 | 12A | 0.00% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Low | 2 | 91.50% | 4.3133 | 17.62 | 14A 2C | +18.65% | +8.57% | |||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 2 | 98.33% | 5.0426 | 15.27 | 13A 4C | +22.36% | +20.31% | |||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 2 | 80.72% | 6.7754 | 7.97 | 9A 3C | +15.34% | -6.90% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 1 | 100.00% | 6.4577 | 10.53 | 13A 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 5 | 42.21% | 2.8956 | 14.85 | 8A 4C 1D 1M | +59.16% | -32.81% | |||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Med | 2 | 74.91% | 4.5670 | 16.86 | 14A 2C 1D | +33.49% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Med | 3 | 71.34% | 4.2345 | 12.28 | 8A 4C | +40.18% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 2 | 79.94% | 4.8561 | 11.12 | 10A 1C 1D | +29.91% | +3.85% | |||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Low | 3 | 85.30% | 4.1425 | 12.07 | 8A 3C 1D | +8.54% | -7.41% | |||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 3 | 67.49% | 4.3303 | 9.93 | 6A 4C 1D | +55.40% | +4.88% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.