Match Performance
Your Performance
60.87% of winner
Place:4 / 6
Match %:60.87%
Match Pts:809.87
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:62.06%
Std Dev:15.6
Spread:61.8 pts
Hits:168A 72C 17D 4M 1NS
Best:
84.64% (S12)
Worst:
22.84% (S6)
Division Winner
Michał KORONKIEWICZ
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:1330.51
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:98.90%
Std Dev:3.0
Spread:13.5 pts
Hits:211A 50C 6D 2M
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
86.54% (S9)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 4.6× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
59.30%
16 stages · 22.84% – 84.64%
Low HF(Technical)
77.28%
3 stages · 75.11% – 79.26%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
62.87%
10 stages · 22.84% – 79.26%
Medium(13-24 shots)
61.41%
9 stages · 38.77% – 84.64%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 3 | 68.12% | 3.8926 | 14.90 | 9A 4C 1D | +29.00% | -12.12% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 3 | 63.72% | 3.3380 | 14.38 | 7A 4C 1D | +34.52% | -14.29% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 4 | 38.77% | 3.3128 | 12.98 | 9A 6C 1M 1NS | +49.88% | -41.89% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 4 | 70.25% | 5.5829 | 12.18 | 11A 4C 1D | +34.44% | -5.56% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 5 | 49.46% | 3.0172 | 23.20 | 12A 6C 2D 1M | +45.91% | -27.84% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 5 | 22.84% | 1.4476 | 17.27 | 5A 2C 4D 1M | +88.74% | -56.90% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 | - | - | - | 10.76 | 4A 4M | - | - | - | - | - |
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 5 | 36.07% | 2.1423 | 13.07 | 7A 1C 1M | +80.52% | -34.88% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Low | 3 | 78.19% | 3.4223 | 14.61 | 8A 3C 1D | +39.01% | +8.70% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 3 | 75.22% | 4.3478 | 13.34 | 11A 1C | +28.52% | -3.33% | - | ||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Low | 3 | 75.11% | 3.5408 | 18.64 | 10A 5C 1D | +25.52% | -5.71% | |||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 3 | 84.64% | 4.3405 | 17.74 | 13A 4C | +42.15% | +20.31% | |||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 4 | 61.03% | 5.1225 | 8.98 | 6A 5C 1D | +29.96% | -20.69% | - | ||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 5 | 55.23% | 3.5665 | 14.58 | 6A 7C 1D | +38.46% | -23.53% | - | ||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 4 | 50.30% | 3.4503 | 16.81 | 9A 4C 1D | +80.17% | -9.38% | |||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Med | 5 | 61.75% | 3.7646 | 18.86 | 12A 3C 2D | +49.33% | -7.79% | |||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Med | 5 | 64.06% | 3.8028 | 14.20 | 9A 3C | +62.10% | +3.85% | - | ||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 5 | 66.86% | 4.0617 | 12.31 | 8A 3C 1D | +43.81% | -3.85% | |||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Low | 4 | 79.26% | 3.8489 | 14.03 | 9A 3C | +26.17% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 2 | 75.83% | 4.8654 | 9.66 | 7A 4C | +51.17% | +14.63% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.