Match Performance
Your Performance
60.77% of winner
Place:5 / 6
Match %:60.77%
Match Pts:808.55
Consistency:Variable
Avg:60.41%
Std Dev:16.0
Spread:88.2 pts
Hits:194A 64C 7D 4M 2NS
Best:
100.00% (S7)
Worst:
11.79% (S6)
Division Winner
Michał KORONKIEWICZ
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:1330.51
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:98.90%
Std Dev:3.0
Spread:13.5 pts
Hits:211A 50C 6D 2M
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
86.54% (S9)
10%
55%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 6.6× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
58.18%
16 stages · 11.79% – 76.70%
Low HF(Technical)
70.28%
4 stages · 53.25% – 100.00%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
62.16%
11 stages · 11.79% – 100.00%
Medium(13-24 shots)
58.89%
9 stages · 37.96% – 76.70%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 4 | 62.93% | 3.5958 | 16.13 | 8A 6C | +39.65% | -12.12% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 2 | 65.28% | 3.4199 | 15.79 | 9A 3C | +47.71% | -3.57% | |||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 5 | 37.96% | 3.2437 | 21.58 | 11A 5C | +149.19% | -5.41% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 5 | 43.50% | 3.4571 | 15.62 | 13A 3C 2NS | +72.41% | -25.00% | |||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 3 | 59.86% | 3.6517 | 24.92 | 15A 5C 1D | +56.73% | -6.19% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 6 | 11.79% | 0.7475 | 12.04 | 6A 3C 3M | +31.58% | -84.48% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Low | 1 | 100.00% | 4.2150 | 9.49 | 8A | 0.00% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 2 | 62.58% | 3.7165 | 11.57 | 8A 1C | +59.81% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Low | 5 | 72.09% | 3.1553 | 16.48 | 9A 2C 1D | +56.80% | +13.04% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 5 | 51.55% | 2.9799 | 14.43 | 10A 1C 1M | +39.02% | -28.33% | |||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Low | 5 | 63.12% | 2.9754 | 21.51 | 10A 4C 2D | +44.85% | -8.57% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 5 | 76.70% | 3.9335 | 18.05 | 11A 5C 1D | +44.63% | +10.94% | |||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Med | 3 | 70.45% | 5.9134 | 9.47 | 10A 2C | +37.05% | -3.45% | |||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 4 | 60.54% | 3.9092 | 15.86 | 10A 4C | +50.62% | -8.82% | |||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 3 | 57.35% | 3.9340 | 15.76 | 10A 4C | +68.92% | -3.13% | |||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Med | 4 | 66.70% | 4.0663 | 19.92 | 15A 2C | +57.72% | +5.19% | |||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Med | 4 | 64.89% | 3.8516 | 14.02 | 9A 3C | +60.05% | +3.85% | - | ||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 3 | 73.28% | 4.4515 | 12.58 | 10A 2C | +46.96% | +7.69% | |||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Low | 5 | 53.25% | 2.5856 | 15.47 | 4A 6C 2D | +39.12% | -25.93% | |||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 5 | 65.22% | 4.1845 | 11.71 | 8A 3C | +83.26% | +19.51% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.