Match Performance
Your Performance
35.05% of winner
Place:14 / 17
Match %:35.05%
Match Pts:167.28
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:33.46%
Std Dev:9.0
Spread:23.9 pts
Hits:79A 12C 4D 5M 3NS
Best:
41.26% (S1)
Worst:
17.33% (S2)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
10%
55%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 2.0× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
30.86%
3 stages · 17.33% – 39.68%
Low HF(Technical)
41.26%
1 stage · 41.26%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
24.29%
2 stages · 17.33% – 30.34%
Long(25+ shots)
40.37%
2 stages · 39.68% – 41.26%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 11 | 41.26% | 1.8571 | 52.77 | 19A 4C 1D 1M | +106.54% | -14.78% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 16 | 17.33% | 0.9167 | 62.18 | 16A 2C 1D 1M 2NS | +249.92% | -39.36% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 15 | 30.34% | 1.7096 | 45.04 | 18A 2C 1D 2M | +120.68% | -33.04% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 11 | 39.68% | 2.0118 | 61.14 | 26A 4C 1D 1M 1NS | +103.94% | -19.08% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.