Match Performance
Your Performance
20.61% of winner
Place:16 / 17
Match %:20.61%
Match Pts:98.35
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:19.67%
Std Dev:2.4
Spread:7.0 pts
Hits:62A 22C 5D 11M 5NS
Best:
22.83% (S1)
Worst:
15.84% (S2)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
10%
55%
100%
You Winner Avg
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
18.61%
3 stages · 15.84% – 20.13%
Low HF(Technical)
22.83%
1 stage · 22.83%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
17.49%
2 stages · 15.84% – 18.92%
Long(25+ shots)
21.31%
2 stages · 20.13% – 22.83%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 15 | 22.83% | 1.0278 | 62.27 | 19A 3C 3M 1NS | +143.72% | -44.35% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 17 | 15.84% | 0.8381 | 44.15 | 13A 4C 3M 1NS | +148.45% | -60.64% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 17 | 18.92% | 1.0658 | 37.53 | 12A 6C 2D 3M 1NS | +83.88% | -65.22% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 17 | 20.13% | 1.0207 | 78.38 | 18A 9C 3D 2M 2NS | +161.44% | -47.37% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.