Match Performance
Your Performance
45.10% of winner
Place:11 / 17
Match %:45.10%
Match Pts:215.22
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:43.04%
Std Dev:6.7
Spread:18.4 pts
Hits:75A 17C 6D 2M 3NS
Best:
54.17% (S3)
Worst:
35.78% (S1)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
30%
65%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 1.5× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
45.47%
3 stages · 39.94% – 54.17%
Low HF(Technical)
35.78%
1 stage · 35.78%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
49.58%
2 stages · 44.30% – 54.17%
Long(25+ shots)
38.12%
2 stages · 35.78% – 39.94%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 12 | 35.78% | 1.6105 | 39.74 | 17A 6C 1D 1M 3NS | +55.54% | -44.35% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 11 | 44.30% | 2.3434 | 39.26 | 17A 2C 1D | +120.93% | -2.13% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 11 | 54.17% | 3.0524 | 30.14 | 18A 4C 1M | +47.67% | -20.00% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 10 | 39.94% | 2.0248 | 66.18 | 23A 5C 4D | +120.75% | -11.84% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.