Match Performance
Your Performance
51.59% of winner
Place:10 / 17
Match %:51.59%
Match Pts:246.19
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:49.24%
Std Dev:8.9
Spread:24.3 pts
Hits:58A 31C 9D 2M 1NS 1P
Best:
63.21% (S3)
Worst:
38.89% (S4)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
30%
65%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 2.0× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
48.98%
3 stages · 38.89% – 63.21%
Low HF(Technical)
50.00%
1 stage · 50.00%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
56.49%
2 stages · 48.77% – 63.21%
Long(25+ shots)
43.76%
2 stages · 38.89% – 50.00%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 10 | 50.00% | 2.2507 | 31.99 | 13A 8C 3D 1M 1P | +25.21% | -37.39% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 10 | 48.77% | 2.5798 | 29.46 | 11A 6C 3D | +65.79% | -19.15% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 10 | 63.21% | 3.5615 | 28.92 | 17A 6C | +41.70% | -10.43% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 12 | 38.89% | 1.9719 | 51.22 | 17A 11C 3D 1M 1NS | +70.85% | -33.55% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.