Match Performance
Your Performance
65.78% of winner
Place:8 / 17
Match %:65.78%
Match Pts:313.95
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:62.79%
Std Dev:9.0
Spread:24.4 pts
Hits:85A 13C 2D 1NS 1P
Best:
76.24% (S3)
Worst:
51.88% (S4)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
50%
75%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 2.0× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
62.12%
3 stages · 51.88% – 76.24%
Low HF(Technical)
64.79%
1 stage · 64.79%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
69.74%
2 stages · 62.27% – 76.24%
Long(25+ shots)
57.54%
2 stages · 51.88% – 64.79%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 8 | 64.79% | 2.9163 | 40.12 | 23A 2D | +57.03% | +1.74% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 7 | 62.27% | 3.2938 | 26.11 | 13A 7C | +46.93% | -8.51% | |||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 6 | 76.24% | 4.2959 | 26.77 | 23A | +31.16% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 9 | 51.88% | 2.6305 | 48.66 | 26A 6C 1NS 1P | +62.31% | -15.79% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.