Match Performance
Your Performance
72.10% of winner
Place:7 / 17
Match %:72.10%
Match Pts:344.12
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:68.83%
Std Dev:14.3
Spread:35.8 pts
Hits:90A 9C 1M 2NS 1P
Best:
87.80% (S1)
Worst:
51.98% (S4)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
50%
75%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 3.0× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
62.50%
3 stages · 51.98% – 76.93%
Low HF(Technical)
87.80%
1 stage · 87.80%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
70.33%
2 stages · 62.74% – 76.93%
Long(25+ shots)
67.69%
2 stages · 51.98% – 87.80%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 5 | 87.80% | 3.9519 | 29.10 | 20A 5C | +13.89% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 6 | 62.74% | 3.3188 | 22.90 | 18A 2C 2NS | +28.87% | -19.15% | |||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 5 | 76.93% | 4.3345 | 26.07 | 22A 1C | +27.73% | -1.74% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 8 | 51.98% | 2.6352 | 50.47 | 30A 1C 1M 1P | +68.35% | -12.50% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.