Match Performance
Your Performance
39.64% of winner
Place:13 / 17
Match %:39.64%
Match Pts:189.18
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:37.83%
Std Dev:7.7
Spread:19.6 pts
Hits:76A 17C 3D 4M
Best:
48.54% (S3)
Worst:
28.99% (S4)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 1.6× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
38.83%
3 stages · 28.99% – 48.54%
Low HF(Technical)
34.84%
1 stage · 34.84%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
46.15%
2 stages · 43.41% – 48.54%
Long(25+ shots)
31.56%
2 stages · 28.99% – 34.84%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 13 | 34.84% | 1.5682 | 59.94 | 18A 4C 2D 1M | +134.60% | -18.26% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 13 | 43.41% | 2.2964 | 37.45 | 13A 7C | +110.75% | -8.51% | |||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 12 | 48.54% | 2.7353 | 39.85 | 20A 3C | +95.25% | -5.22% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 14 | 28.99% | 1.4700 | 71.43 | 25A 3C 1D 3M | +138.26% | -30.92% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.