Match Performance
Your Performance
52.86% of winner
Place:9 / 17
Match %:52.86%
Match Pts:252.26
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:50.45%
Std Dev:10.1
Spread:24.1 pts
Hits:80A 13C 1D 6M 3NS
Best:
59.67% (S1)
Worst:
35.58% (S3)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
30%
65%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 2.0× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
47.38%
3 stages · 35.58% – 58.27%
Low HF(Technical)
59.67%
1 stage · 59.67%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
39.27%
2 stages · 35.58% – 43.52%
Long(25+ shots)
58.88%
2 stages · 58.27% – 59.67%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 9 | 59.67% | 2.6860 | 38.72 | 21A 3C 1M | +51.55% | -9.57% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 12 | 43.52% | 2.3019 | 26.50 | 12A 7C 1M 1NS | +49.13% | -35.11% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 13 | 35.58% | 2.0047 | 29.93 | 20A 3M 1NS | +46.64% | -47.83% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 7 | 58.27% | 2.9544 | 42.31 | 27A 3C 1D 1M 1NS | +41.13% | -17.76% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.