Match Performance
Your Performance
76.69% of winner
Place:6 / 17
Match %:76.69%
Match Pts:365.99
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:73.20%
Std Dev:12.1
Spread:28.6 pts
Hits:83A 16C 1M
Best:
94.21% (S1)
Worst:
65.62% (S2)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
60%
80%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 2.4× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
66.19%
3 stages · 65.62% – 66.46%
Low HF(Technical)
94.21%
1 stage · 94.21%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
65.99%
2 stages · 65.62% – 66.32%
Long(25+ shots)
78.63%
2 stages · 66.46% – 94.21%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 2 | 94.21% | 4.2404 | 27.12 | 20A 5C | +6.14% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 5 | 65.62% | 3.4710 | 22.76 | 16A 3C 1M | +28.08% | -15.96% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 7 | 66.32% | 3.7367 | 28.10 | 18A 5C | +37.68% | -8.70% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 5 | 66.46% | 3.3698 | 45.70 | 29A 3C | +52.43% | +1.32% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.