Match Performance
Your Performance
18.78% of winner
Place:17 / 17
Match %:18.78%
Match Pts:89.64
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:17.93%
Std Dev:9.6
Spread:24.1 pts
Hits:69A 20C 2D 9M 4NS 2P
Best:
25.66% (S4)
Worst:
1.52% (S1)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
0%
50%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 2.0× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
23.40%
3 stages · 21.59% – 25.66%
Low HF(Technical)
1.52%
1 stage · 1.52%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
21.72%
2 stages · 21.59% – 21.83%
Long(25+ shots)
15.07%
2 stages · 1.52% – 25.66%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 17 | 1.52% | 0.0684 | 43.84 | 13A 6C 6M 2P | +71.59% | -97.39% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 15 | 21.59% | 1.1421 | 77.05 | 19A 1C 1NS | +333.60% | -6.38% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 16 | 21.83% | 1.2297 | 53.67 | 19A 1D 3M | +162.96% | -42.61% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 16 | 25.66% | 1.3009 | 76.87 | 18A 13C 1D 3NS | +156.40% | -34.21% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.