Match Performance
Your Performance
91.42% of winner
Place:2 / 17
Match %:91.42%
Match Pts:436.32
Consistency:Variable
Avg:87.26%
Std Dev:18.2
Spread:47.4 pts
Hits:84A 15C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
52.65% (S2)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
50%
75%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 3.9× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
83.02%
3 stages · 52.65% – 100.00%
Low HF(Technical)
100.00%
1 stage · 100.00%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
70.38%
2 stages · 52.65% – 85.80%
Long(25+ shots)
100.00%
2 stages · 100.00% – 100.00%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 1 | 100.00% | 4.5010 | 25.55 | 20A 5C | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 8 | 52.65% | 2.7852 | 33.75 | 17A 3C | +89.93% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 3 | 85.80% | 4.8343 | 21.72 | 19A 3C 1D | +6.42% | -8.70% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 1 | 100.00% | 5.0700 | 29.98 | 28A 4C | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.