Match Performance
Your Performance
40.49% of winner
Place:12 / 17
Match %:40.49%
Match Pts:193.24
Consistency:Variable
Avg:38.65%
Std Dev:17.0
Spread:44.6 pts
Hits:70A 19C 6D 5M 2P
Best:
63.47% (S3)
Worst:
18.84% (S1)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
10%
55%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 3.7× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
45.26%
3 stages · 29.56% – 63.47%
Low HF(Technical)
18.84%
1 stage · 18.84%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
56.94%
2 stages · 49.42% – 63.47%
Long(25+ shots)
24.86%
2 stages · 18.84% – 29.56%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 16 | 18.84% | 0.8479 | 41.28 | 17A 3C 1D 4M 2P | +61.57% | -69.57% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 9 | 49.42% | 2.6144 | 30.60 | 11A 8C 1D | +72.20% | -14.89% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 9 | 63.47% | 3.5760 | 31.04 | 21A 2C | +52.08% | -3.48% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 13 | 29.56% | 1.4985 | 78.08 | 21A 6C 4D 1M | +160.44% | -23.03% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.