Match Performance
Your Performance
80.51% of winner
Place:4 / 17
Match %:80.51%
Match Pts:384.25
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:76.85%
Std Dev:9.4
Spread:21.3 pts
Hits:79A 20C 1D 1NS
Best:
84.48% (S3)
Worst:
63.22% (S4)
Division Winner
Sebastian Osiecki
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:477.26
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:95.45%
Std Dev:4.8
Spread:12.1 pts
Hits:85A 14C 1D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
87.89% (S1)
60%
80%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 1.8× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
75.33%
3 stages · 63.22% – 84.48%
Low HF(Technical)
81.42%
1 stage · 81.42%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
84.34%
2 stages · 84.18% – 84.48%
Long(25+ shots)
71.20%
2 stages · 63.22% – 81.42%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 6 | 81.42% | 3.6646 | 30.29 | 23A 2C 1NS | +18.55% | -3.48% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 2 | 84.18% | 4.4529 | 21.11 | 17A 3C | +18.80% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 4 | 84.48% | 4.7597 | 22.06 | 18A 5C | +8.08% | -8.70% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 6 | 63.22% | 3.2053 | 42.43 | 21A 10C 1D | +41.53% | -10.53% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.