Match Performance
Your Performance
74.56% of winner
Place:6 / 7
Match %:74.56%
Match Pts:707.54
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:71.83%
Std Dev:15.2
Spread:71.2 pts
Hits:144A 38C 11D 4M 1NS
Best:
93.57% (S6)
Worst:
22.40% (S8)
Division Winner
Michał Koronkiewicz
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:948.93
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:96.34%
Std Dev:6.6
Spread:20.9 pts
Hits:147A 45C 4D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
79.13% (S1)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 3.4× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
71.99%
9 stages · 22.40% – 93.57%
Low HF(Technical)
69.50%
1 stage · 69.50%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
62.26%
4 stages · 22.40% – 85.15%
Medium(13-24 shots)
75.55%
4 stages · 65.54% – 93.57%
Long(25+ shots)
73.47%
2 stages · 71.88% – 75.43%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 4 | 65.54% | 4.1921 | 24.57 | 18A 4C 1D | +44.19% | -5.50% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Low | 4 | 69.50% | 2.6649 | 15.01 | 5A 4C 3D | +15.11% | -20.00% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 3 | 73.92% | 3.8674 | 10.86 | 8A 2D | +62.33% | +20.00% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 4 | 75.43% | 6.1487 | 17.89 | 17A 8C 1D | +30.20% | -1.79% | |||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 4 | 77.36% | 5.5470 | 19.47 | 20A 2C 2D | +26.92% | -1.82% | |||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 3 | 93.57% | 5.4315 | 19.70 | 19A 4C | +17.89% | +10.31% | |||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 6 | 65.65% | 4.1276 | 21.32 | 16A 6C 1M | +27.66% | -16.19% | |||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 7 | 22.40% | 1.2987 | 12.32 | 8A 2C 2M 1NS | +19.03% | -73.33% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 4 | 85.15% | 4.3882 | 11.85 | 9A 2C 1D | +17.44% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 5 | 71.88% | 4.5745 | 28.20 | 24A 6C 1D 1M | +22.93% | -11.64% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.