Match Performance
Your Performance
81.04% of winner
Place:3 / 7
Match %:81.04%
Match Pts:768.99
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:78.07%
Std Dev:11.1
Spread:39.0 pts
Hits:137A 50C 9D 1M
Best:
93.35% (S9)
Worst:
54.33% (S2)
Division Winner
Michał Koronkiewicz
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:948.93
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:96.34%
Std Dev:6.6
Spread:20.9 pts
Hits:147A 45C 4D 1M 1NS
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
79.13% (S1)
50%
75%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 1.9× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
79.61%
9 stages · 63.56% – 93.35%
Low HF(Technical)
54.33%
1 stage · 54.33%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
75.13%
4 stages · 54.33% – 93.35%
Medium(13-24 shots)
81.69%
4 stages · 63.56% – 93.24%
Long(25+ shots)
74.60%
2 stages · 71.17% – 77.38%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 5 | 63.56% | 4.0660 | 24.84 | 16A 7C | +45.77% | -7.34% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Low | 6 | 54.33% | 2.0833 | 14.88 | 6A 3C 2D 1M | +14.11% | -38.00% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 5 | 69.73% | 3.6479 | 12.61 | 9A 1D | +88.49% | +31.43% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 5 | 71.17% | 5.8017 | 18.96 | 17A 8C 1D | +37.99% | -1.79% | |||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 3 | 83.37% | 5.9786 | 17.73 | 18A 5C 1D | +15.58% | -3.64% | |||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 4 | 86.50% | 5.0211 | 18.92 | 14A 8C 1D | +13.23% | -2.06% | |||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 3 | 93.24% | 5.8626 | 17.91 | 18A 5C | +7.25% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 3 | 82.21% | 4.7660 | 11.75 | 10A 2C | +13.53% | -6.67% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 3 | 93.35% | 4.8110 | 11.64 | 10A 2C | +15.36% | +7.69% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 4 | 77.38% | 4.9250 | 25.99 | 19A 10C 3D | +13.30% | -12.33% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.