Dariusz Liszka

The Grand Slam 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
35.68% of winner
Place:12 / 12
Match %:35.68%
Match Pts:1303.98
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:34.96%
Std Dev:8.2
Spread:48.4 pts
Hits:618A 113C 8D 7M 3NS 2P
Best:
54.82% (S4)
Worst:
6.45% (S16)
Division Winner
Michal Koronkiewicz
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:3654.66
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:97.98%
Std Dev:5.3
Spread:33.6 pts
Hits:655A 85C 5D 1M
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
66.42% (S22)
0%
50%
100%
You Winner Avg

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

High HF(Speed)
40.30%
2 stages · 38.73% – 41.09%
Medium HF(Balanced)
34.44%
32 stages · 6.45% – 54.82%
Low HF(Technical)
37.03%
6 stages · 27.30% – 47.71%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
36.60%
20 stages · 18.29% – 54.82%
Medium(13-24 shots)
34.65%
15 stages · 6.45% – 43.81%
Long(25+ shots)
33.23%
5 stages · 29.66% – 36.29%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
1218.29%0.995223.117A 2C 2D 1M 1NS
+124.59%
-58.93%
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
1234.73%2.405939.0719A 3C 1NS
+155.36%
-11.32%
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
1236.29%2.165667.8827A 4C
+171.85%
-1.34%
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
1054.82%2.876320.8612A
+110.49%
+15.38%
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
1231.56%2.193050.1619A 5C
+195.41%
-6.78%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Low
1245.34%2.046827.3610A 2C
+105.87%
-6.67%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Med
1232.24%2.076844.7817A 6C 1M
+148.64%
-19.83%
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
1127.81%1.541832.438A 3C 1D
+221.09%
-10.71%
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
1235.35%2.188222.857A 5C
+143.86%
-13.79%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
1236.58%2.078054.8621A 3C
+173.34%
0.00%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Low
1227.30%1.064054.5111A 1C
+279.33%
+3.57%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
1233.63%2.052172.1226A 6C
+193.41%
-1.33%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
1241.73%2.942034.3321A 2C 1M
+112.31%
-11.40%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Low
1231.01%1.439941.6712A
+233.63%
+3.45%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Low
1047.71%2.361923.7110A 2C
+95.63%
-6.67%
-
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
126.45%0.368843.3810A 8C 2D 4M
2P
+129.65%
-85.19%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Med
1231.46%1.939776.3026A 6C
+209.53%
-2.63%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
1228.57%1.963125.478A 3C 1D
+201.78%
-13.79%
-
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
1242.90%2.704137.7218A 4C
+116.16%
-7.27%
-
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
1230.45%1.777223.077A 2C
+199.22%
-8.89%
-
Stage 21
Stage 21
Med
1242.80%2.180953.1922A 2C
+141.99%
+3.57%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Low
1144.61%2.009319.416A 3C
+149.81%
+11.43%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
1234.14%2.607942.1819A 5C
+168.49%
-8.33%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
1144.69%2.708319.208A 4C
+115.49%
-3.70%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
1243.55%2.724822.0212A
+146.03%
+7.14%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
1239.90%2.740442.3322A 2C
+150.62%
0.00%
-
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
1231.31%1.955061.3824A
+224.76%
+1.69%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
1233.84%1.733527.697A 4C 1D
+172.81%
-7.69%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
1243.81%2.208153.4423A 1C
+128.28%
0.00%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
1247.35%4.387313.2211A 1C
+111.18%
0.00%
-
Stage 31
Stage 31
Med
1134.57%2.463722.7310A 2C
+169.95%
-6.67%
Stage 32
Stage 32
Med
1234.27%2.812639.1122A
+197.19%
+1.85%
Stage 33
Stage 33
Med
1229.66%2.234567.1327A 5C
+224.14%
-3.85%
-
Stage 34
Stage 34
Med
1236.03%2.500022.4010A 2C
+177.57%
0.00%
-
Stage 35
Stage 35
Med
1234.36%2.015328.7811A 1C
+181.33%
-3.33%
Stage 36
Stage 36
Med
1226.87%1.692262.6417A 7C
+246.08%
-7.02%
Stage 37
Stage 37
High
1241.09%4.944424.2724A
+151.76%
+3.45%
Stage 38
Stage 38
Low
1128.10%1.360127.947A 4C 1D 1NS
+141.49%
-32.14%
Stage 39
Stage 39
High
1238.73%4.575212.2410A 2C
+149.29%
-3.45%
-
Stage 40
Stage 40
Med
1235.26%2.069573.9330A 1C
+212.20%
+10.07%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.