Mark Szegedi

The Grand Slam 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
79.42% of winner
Place:6 / 12
Match %:79.42%
Match Pts:2902.44
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:77.81%
Std Dev:10.0
Spread:52.1 pts
Hits:642A 88C 11D 5M 1NS
Best:
97.88% (S11)
Worst:
45.80% (S9)
Division Winner
Michal Koronkiewicz
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:3654.66
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:97.98%
Std Dev:5.3
Spread:33.6 pts
Hits:655A 85C 5D 1M
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
66.42% (S22)
40%
70%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 1.6× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

High HF(Speed)
78.50%
2 stages · 75.92% – 79.79%
Medium HF(Balanced)
76.80%
32 stages · 45.80% – 90.04%
Low HF(Technical)
86.84%
6 stages · 71.06% – 97.88%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
75.36%
20 stages · 45.80% – 97.88%
Medium(13-24 shots)
79.71%
15 stages · 61.03% – 90.04%
Long(25+ shots)
77.20%
5 stages · 70.56% – 89.14%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
377.50%4.217911.387A 4C 1D
+10.59%
-14.29%
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
580.56%5.581417.2020A 2C 1NS
+12.42%
-9.43%
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
870.70%4.219033.4226A 3C 2D
+33.84%
-5.37%
-
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
572.71%3.815411.2710A 1C 1M
+13.72%
-17.31%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
876.37%5.307321.4821A 3C
+26.50%
-3.39%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Low
297.29%4.392212.7510A 2C
-4.06%
-6.67%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Med
583.69%5.390321.5223A 1D
+19.49%
0.00%
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
364.37%3.569014.5710A 2D
+44.26%
-7.14%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
1045.80%2.835213.058A 2C 1D 1M
+39.27%
-36.21%
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
490.04%5.114422.2921A 3C
+11.06%
0.00%
Stage 11
Stage 11
Low
397.88%3.814415.7312A
+9.46%
+7.14%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
582.20%5.016131.1030A 2C
+26.53%
+4.00%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
584.68%5.970118.0919A 4C 1D
+11.87%
-5.26%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Low
293.56%4.344512.8910A 2C
+3.20%
-3.45%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Low
677.92%3.857613.489A 2C 1D
+11.22%
-13.33%
-
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
485.91%4.912021.5817A 7C
+14.24%
-1.85%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Med
673.56%4.536033.5128A 4C
+35.94%
0.00%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
387.12%5.98679.029A 3C
+6.87%
-6.90%
-
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
485.40%5.383419.6920A 2C
+12.84%
-3.64%
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
385.86%5.01118.989A
+16.47%
0.00%
Stage 21
Stage 21
Med
673.86%3.763429.7620A 4C
+35.40%
0.00%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Low
671.06%3.200810.314A 4C 1D
+32.69%
-5.71%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
583.03%6.342518.9224A
+20.43%
0.00%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
780.71%4.891311.049A 3C
+23.91%
0.00%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
875.80%4.743112.6512A
+41.34%
+7.14%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
576.67%5.265621.6522A 1C 1D
+28.18%
-1.72%
-
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
764.63%4.035029.7424A
+57.35%
+1.69%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
851.40%2.633414.818A 3C 1M
+45.91%
-25.00%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
781.49%4.107526.7819A 5C
+14.40%
-6.78%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
670.39%6.52178.289A 3C
+32.27%
-6.90%
-
Stage 31
Stage 31
Med
857.11%4.069813.7610A 2C
+63.42%
-6.67%
Stage 32
Stage 32
Med
961.03%5.008318.1719A 2C 1M
+38.07%
-15.74%
Stage 33
Stage 33
Med
770.56%5.315229.3530A 2C
+41.72%
0.00%
Stage 34
Stage 34
Med
575.75%5.25647.809A 2C 1M
-3.35%
-26.79%
Stage 35
Stage 35
Med
671.25%4.178713.8811A 1C
+35.68%
-3.33%
-
Stage 36
Stage 36
Med
387.44%5.507419.6118A 6C
+8.34%
-5.26%
-
Stage 37
Stage 37
High
579.79%9.601312.2923A 1C
+27.49%
+1.72%
-
Stage 38
Stage 38
Low
679.41%3.843514.5710A 2C
+25.93%
0.00%
-
Stage 39
Stage 39
High
575.92%8.96866.6912A
+36.25%
+3.45%
-
Stage 40
Stage 40
Med
589.14%5.232629.2430A 1C
+23.48%
+10.07%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.