Mateusz Wloczewski

The Grand Slam 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
53.42% of winner
Place:11 / 12
Match %:53.42%
Match Pts:1952.40
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:52.34%
Std Dev:11.1
Spread:45.6 pts
Hits:508A 199C 25D 14M 1NS
Best:
72.38% (S19)
Worst:
26.79% (S38)
Division Winner
Michal Koronkiewicz
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:3654.66
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:97.98%
Std Dev:5.3
Spread:33.6 pts
Hits:655A 85C 5D 1M
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
66.42% (S22)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

High HF(Speed)
49.43%
2 stages · 43.54% – 61.20%
Medium HF(Balanced)
52.18%
32 stages · 32.60% – 72.38%
Low HF(Technical)
55.41%
6 stages · 26.79% – 67.38%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
51.22%
20 stages · 26.79% – 67.38%
Medium(13-24 shots)
52.44%
15 stages · 38.50% – 72.38%
Long(25+ shots)
53.78%
5 stages · 32.60% – 65.21%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
863.54%3.457814.468A 3C 1D
+40.52%
-10.71%
-
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
1154.36%3.765922.0420A 1C 1M 1NS
+44.05%
-21.70%
-
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
965.21%3.891435.7224A 6C 1D
+43.05%
-6.71%
-
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
1149.21%2.581920.148A 4C
+103.23%
0.00%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
1147.18%3.278734.1620A 4C
+101.18%
-5.08%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Low
1160.62%2.736718.278A 3C 1D
+37.47%
-16.67%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Med
1154.39%3.503231.4020A 3C 1D
+74.35%
-5.17%
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
855.39%3.071015.636A 6C
+54.75%
-14.29%
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
1140.30%2.494313.236A 4C 1D 1M
+41.20%
-43.10%
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
1150.66%2.877727.8017A 5C 2M
+38.52%
-29.82%
Stage 11
Stage 11
Low
1059.78%2.329722.328A 4C
+55.32%
-7.14%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
964.83%3.956535.8923A 9C
+46.01%
-5.33%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
1162.50%4.406023.1517A 5C 2D
+43.17%
-10.53%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Low
866.83%3.103318.6911A 1C
+49.64%
0.00%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Low
867.38%3.335614.997A 5C
+23.68%
-16.67%
-
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
1048.83%2.791833.6712A 11C 1D
+78.24%
-12.96%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Med
1043.56%2.686153.6124A 8C
+117.48%
-5.26%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
1143.75%3.006413.975A 5C 2D
+65.52%
-27.59%
-
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
772.38%4.562421.4818A 2C 2D
+23.09%
-10.91%
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
865.04%3.796310.807A 2C
+40.08%
-8.89%
Stage 21
Stage 21
Med
1157.42%2.925734.1817A 4C 3D
+55.51%
-10.71%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Low
1049.64%2.23608.054A 2C 2D 1M
+3.60%
-48.57%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
1141.53%3.172023.9615A 7C 2M
+52.51%
-36.67%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
1239.76%2.409620.757A 5C
+132.88%
-7.41%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
1153.69%3.359211.619A 1C 1D 1M
+29.72%
-30.36%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
867.84%4.659322.7518A 5C 1D
+34.70%
-8.62%
-
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
1151.06%3.188128.2310A 13C 1D
+49.37%
-23.73%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
1139.87%2.042524.488A 3C 1D
+141.18%
-3.85%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
1157.18%2.882235.3916A 7C 1D
+51.17%
-13.56%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
1059.31%5.495610.1910A 2C
+62.78%
-3.45%
-
Stage 31
Stage 31
Med
1233.69%2.400917.9110A 1C 1M
+112.71%
-28.33%
Stage 32
Stage 32
Med
1138.50%3.159526.2715A 6C 1M
+99.62%
-23.15%
Stage 33
Stage 33
Med
1132.60%2.455846.4222A 8C 2M
+124.14%
-26.92%
Stage 34
Stage 34
Med
1043.62%3.026616.527A 5C
+104.71%
-10.71%
Stage 35
Stage 35
Med
1148.08%2.819719.8610A 2C
+94.13%
-6.67%
-
Stage 36
Stage 36
Med
1039.93%2.515036.5811A 12C 1D
+102.10%
-19.30%
-
Stage 37
Stage 37
High
1143.54%5.239319.8516A 8C
+105.91%
-10.34%
-
Stage 38
Stage 38
Low
1226.79%1.296813.884A 6C 2M
+19.97%
-67.86%
-
Stage 39
Stage 39
High
1061.20%7.22897.479A 3C
+52.14%
-6.90%
-
Stage 40
Stage 40
Med
1063.36%3.719535.2221A 8C 2D
+48.73%
-5.76%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.