Guy Lozachmeur

The Grand Slam 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
63.99% of winner
Place:9 / 12
Match %:63.99%
Match Pts:2338.72
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:62.70%
Std Dev:12.4
Spread:78.3 pts
Hits:588A 136C 14D 8M 3P
Best:
79.87% (S5)
Worst:
1.61% (S22)
Division Winner
Michal Koronkiewicz
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:3654.66
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:97.98%
Std Dev:5.3
Spread:33.6 pts
Hits:655A 85C 5D 1M
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
66.42% (S22)
0%
50%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 2.3× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

High HF(Speed)
68.84%
2 stages · 62.71% – 71.90%
Medium HF(Balanced)
62.38%
32 stages · 33.84% – 79.87%
Low HF(Technical)
62.50%
6 stages · 1.61% – 74.56%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
58.60%
20 stages · 1.61% – 74.56%
Medium(13-24 shots)
68.25%
15 stages · 55.19% – 79.87%
Long(25+ shots)
56.35%
5 stages · 33.84% – 69.63%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
1047.54%2.587414.307A 4C 1M
+38.97%
-33.93%
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
960.53%4.193423.3717A 4C 1D
+52.75%
-7.55%
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
1156.39%3.364833.8819A 9C 2D 1M
+35.68%
-23.49%
-
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
956.47%2.963020.2512A
+104.34%
+15.38%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
779.87%5.550321.2623A 1C
+25.21%
0.00%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Low
973.70%3.327216.239A 3C
+22.12%
-10.00%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Med
776.91%4.953622.6120A 4C
+25.54%
-3.45%
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
1045.87%2.543417.306A 4C 2D
+71.29%
-21.43%
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
857.46%3.556814.629A 2C 1D
+56.03%
-10.34%
-
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
862.33%3.540432.2021A 3C
+60.44%
0.00%
-
Stage 11
Stage 11
Low
874.19%2.891320.0611A 1C
+39.60%
+3.57%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
769.63%4.249335.3027A 5C
+43.61%
0.00%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
1064.97%4.580824.4521A 2C 1D
+51.21%
-1.75%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Low
965.09%3.022719.8512A
+58.93%
+3.45%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Low
774.56%3.691014.639A 3C
+20.71%
-10.00%
-
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
964.46%3.685626.5915A 7C 2D
+40.76%
-9.26%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Med
1133.84%2.086533.0721A 8C 3M
3P
+34.16%
-54.61%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
1062.06%4.264713.6011A 1C
+61.14%
0.00%
-
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
969.51%4.381423.2818A 4C
+33.41%
-7.27%
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
674.35%4.339410.379A
+34.50%
0.00%
Stage 21
Stage 21
Med
771.84%3.660630.0519A 5C
+36.72%
-1.79%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Low
121.61%0.072613.781A 5C 1D 2M
+77.35%
-97.14%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
768.38%5.223221.0619A 5C
+34.05%
-8.33%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
869.10%4.187611.949A 1C 2D
+34.01%
-7.41%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
1060.98%3.815411.2710A 1C 1M
+25.92%
-23.21%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
669.56%4.777624.2822A 2C
+43.75%
0.00%
-
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
963.31%3.952627.8319A 5C
+47.25%
-6.78%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
1042.22%2.163124.048A 4C
+136.85%
0.00%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
1070.14%3.535431.6820A 4C
+35.33%
-5.08%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
1157.03%5.283810.229A 3C
+63.26%
-6.90%
-
Stage 31
Stage 31
Med
1045.22%3.222117.3810A 2C
+106.41%
-6.67%
Stage 32
Stage 32
Med
1055.19%4.529022.0817A 5C
+67.78%
-7.41%
Stage 33
Stage 33
Med
954.91%4.136035.3026A 5C 1D
+70.45%
-6.41%
-
Stage 34
Stage 34
Med
851.76%3.592015.5910A 2C
+93.18%
0.00%
-
Stage 35
Stage 35
Med
769.07%4.051013.339A 3C
+30.30%
-10.00%
-
Stage 36
Stage 36
Med
773.22%4.611423.4218A 6C
+29.39%
-5.26%
-
Stage 37
Stage 37
High
871.90%8.651813.8724A
+43.88%
+3.45%
-
Stage 38
Stage 38
Low
970.61%3.417614.638A 3C 1D
+26.45%
-10.71%
-
Stage 39
Stage 39
High
962.71%7.40747.8311A 1C
+59.47%
0.00%
-
Stage 40
Stage 40
Med
967.32%3.951534.6722A 9C
+46.41%
-1.44%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.