Mateusz Bonczkowitz

The Grand Slam 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
78.36% of winner
Place:7 / 12
Match %:78.36%
Match Pts:2863.87
Consistency:Moderate
Avg:76.78%
Std Dev:14.0
Spread:73.9 pts
Hits:600A 125C 13D 8M 1NS 1P
Best:
100.00% (S13)
Worst:
26.06% (S1)
Division Winner
Michal Koronkiewicz
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:3654.66
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:97.98%
Std Dev:5.3
Spread:33.6 pts
Hits:655A 85C 5D 1M
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
66.42% (S22)
20%
60%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 2.2× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

High HF(Speed)
81.98%
2 stages · 63.75% – 91.09%
Medium HF(Balanced)
75.52%
32 stages · 26.06% – 100.00%
Low HF(Technical)
85.74%
6 stages · 79.10% – 96.64%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
75.63%
20 stages · 26.06% – 99.95%
Medium(13-24 shots)
75.80%
15 stages · 58.06% – 100.00%
Long(25+ shots)
80.68%
5 stages · 66.04% – 94.18%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
1126.06%1.418412.699A 1C 2M
1P
+23.32%
-67.86%
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
481.12%5.620418.8620A 2C
+23.27%
0.00%
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
485.81%5.120429.4929A 2C
+18.10%
+1.34%
-
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
382.60%4.334412.9210A 2C
+30.37%
+7.69%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
682.18%5.711319.2619A 5C
+13.43%
-6.78%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Low
590.55%4.087813.219A 3C
-0.60%
-10.00%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Med
683.00%5.346120.9521A 2C 1D
+16.32%
-3.45%
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
656.52%3.133914.047A 2C 3D
+39.01%
-21.43%
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
948.60%3.008112.309A 2D 1M
+31.27%
-36.21%
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
1058.06%3.298024.5617A 5C 1D 1M 1NS
+22.37%
-28.95%
Stage 11
Stage 11
Low
587.68%3.416917.5612A
+22.20%
+7.14%
-
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
866.04%4.029836.2325A 7C
+47.40%
-2.67%
-
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
1100.00%7.050116.1721A 3C
0.00%
0.00%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Low
679.87%3.708814.569A 3C
+16.57%
-6.90%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Low
579.10%3.915713.288A 4C
+9.57%
-13.33%
-
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
682.42%4.712322.0716A 8C
+16.83%
-3.70%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Med
281.31%5.013629.5227A 4C 1D
+19.76%
-2.63%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
292.73%6.37258.168A 4C
-3.32%
-10.34%
-
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
871.28%4.493423.5920A 2C
+35.19%
-3.64%
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
1145.61%2.661911.278A 1M
+46.17%
-33.33%
Stage 21
Stage 21
Med
581.06%4.130427.6021A 3C
+25.57%
+1.79%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Low
396.64%4.35298.506A 2C 1D
+9.40%
+5.71%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
1062.43%4.768621.1821A 2C 1M
+34.82%
-15.83%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
583.79%5.078110.249A 2C 1D
+14.93%
-3.70%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
588.04%5.50859.448A 4C
+5.47%
-7.14%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
966.84%4.590425.2722A 2C
+49.62%
0.00%
-
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
864.62%4.034627.7620A 4C
+46.88%
-5.08%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
666.73%3.418815.218A 4C
+49.85%
0.00%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
583.92%4.230126.9521A 3C
+15.12%
-3.39%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
385.01%7.87627.1110A 2C
+13.58%
-3.45%
-
Stage 31
Stage 31
Med
471.11%5.067611.8412A
+40.62%
0.00%
-
Stage 32
Stage 32
Med
861.08%5.012416.1614A 7C 1M
+22.80%
-25.00%
Stage 33
Stage 33
Med
576.66%5.774525.6326A 6C
+23.76%
-5.13%
Stage 34
Stage 34
Med
299.95%6.93556.2010A 1C 1M
-23.17%
-23.21%
Stage 35
Stage 35
Med
482.72%4.851811.1310A 1C 1D
+8.80%
-10.00%
-
Stage 36
Stage 36
Med
866.68%4.199923.8115A 8C 1D
+31.55%
-12.28%
-
Stage 37
Stage 37
High
391.09%10.961510.4021A 3C
+7.88%
-1.72%
-
Stage 38
Stage 38
Low
583.31%4.032312.407A 5C
+7.17%
-10.71%
-
Stage 39
Stage 39
High
863.75%7.53016.647A 5C
+35.23%
-13.79%
-
Stage 40
Stage 40
Med
494.18%5.528426.5928A 2C 1D
+12.29%
+5.76%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.