Michael Hoiss

The Grand Slam 2026Classic

Match Performance

Your Performance
85.78% of winner
Place:3 / 12
Match %:85.78%
Match Pts:3135.01
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:84.05%
Std Dev:9.9
Spread:40.0 pts
Hits:615A 119C 11D 1M
Best:
100.00% (S4)
Worst:
59.96% (S30)
Division Winner
Michal Koronkiewicz
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:3654.66
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:97.98%
Std Dev:5.3
Spread:33.6 pts
Hits:655A 85C 5D 1M
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
66.42% (S22)
50%
75%
100%
You Winner Avg

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

High HF(Speed)
72.00%
2 stages · 65.02% – 75.49%
Medium HF(Balanced)
84.08%
32 stages · 59.96% – 100.00%
Low HF(Technical)
90.06%
6 stages · 80.27% – 100.00%

By Stage Length

Short(≤12 shots)
80.81%
20 stages · 59.96% – 100.00%
Medium(13-24 shots)
85.70%
15 stages · 70.09% – 95.04%
Long(25+ shots)
85.13%
5 stages · 70.67% – 97.55%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
Stage 1
Stage 1
Med
284.33%4.589611.339A 2C 1D
+10.11%
-7.14%
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
389.44%6.196816.4618A 4C
+7.58%
-3.77%
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
293.24%5.564026.4227A 4C
+5.81%
-1.34%
-
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
1100.00%5.24729.918A 4C
0.00%
0.00%
-
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
584.37%5.863218.4219A 4C 1D
+8.48%
-8.47%
-
Stage 6
Stage 6
Low
689.69%4.049213.8310A 2C
+4.06%
-6.67%
-
Stage 7
Stage 7
Med
488.86%5.723019.5720A 4C
+8.66%
-3.45%
-
Stage 8
Stage 8
Med
462.11%3.443715.109A 2C 1D
+49.50%
-7.14%
-
Stage 9
Stage 9
Med
285.75%5.308110.5510A 2C
+12.59%
-3.45%
Stage 10
Stage 10
Med
589.99%5.111821.9120A 4C
+9.17%
-1.75%
Stage 11
Stage 11
Low
1100.00%3.897014.3710A 2C
0.00%
0.00%
Stage 12
Stage 12
Med
286.71%5.291429.8631A 1C
+21.48%
+5.33%
Stage 13
Stage 13
Med
872.15%5.086816.7114A 8C 1D 1M
+3.34%
-25.44%
-
Stage 14
Stage 14
Low
580.27%3.727613.959A 2C 1D
+11.69%
-10.34%
-
Stage 15
Stage 15
Low
388.10%4.361412.8410A 2C
+5.94%
-6.67%
-
Stage 16
Stage 16
Med
395.04%5.433720.9821A 3C
+11.06%
+5.56%
-
Stage 17
Stage 17
Med
478.13%4.817629.0622A 10C
+17.89%
-7.89%
-
Stage 18
Stage 18
Med
867.87%4.664210.728A 3C 1D
+27.01%
-13.79%
-
Stage 19
Stage 19
Med
387.82%5.536019.8722A
+13.87%
0.00%
Stage 20
Stage 20
Med
479.16%4.62019.749A
+26.33%
0.00%
Stage 21
Stage 21
Med
289.92%4.582024.8821A 3C
+13.19%
+1.79%
-
Stage 22
Stage 22
Low
590.09%4.05839.616A 3C
+23.68%
+11.43%
-
Stage 23
Stage 23
Med
293.51%7.142916.2422A 2C
+3.37%
-3.33%
-
Stage 24
Stage 24
Med
391.49%5.544610.1010A 2C
+13.36%
+3.70%
-
Stage 25
Stage 25
Med
392.33%5.776910.0411A 1C
+12.18%
+3.57%
-
Stage 26
Stage 26
Med
482.74%5.682517.9517A 5C 2D
+6.28%
-12.07%
-
Stage 27
Stage 27
Med
285.23%5.321121.8022A 2C
+15.34%
-1.69%
-
Stage 28
Stage 28
Med
763.05%3.230015.488A 3C 1D
+52.51%
-3.85%
-
Stage 29
Stage 29
Med
294.03%4.739723.6320A 4C
+0.94%
-5.08%
-
Stage 30
Stage 30
Med
959.96%5.55568.647A 4C 1D
+38.02%
-17.24%
-
Stage 31
Stage 31
Med
373.22%5.217411.5012A
+36.58%
0.00%
Stage 32
Stage 32
Med
670.09%5.752218.0820A 1C 1D
+37.39%
-3.70%
Stage 33
Stage 33
Med
670.67%5.323527.0524A 8C
+30.61%
-7.69%
Stage 34
Stage 34
Med
480.38%5.577710.0410A 2C
+24.41%
0.00%
Stage 35
Stage 35
Med
573.12%4.288813.9912A
+36.75%
0.00%
-
Stage 36
Stage 36
Med
486.07%5.420821.0321A 3C
+16.19%
0.00%
-
Stage 37
Stage 37
High
675.49%9.083412.1119A 5C
+25.62%
-5.17%
-
Stage 38
Stage 38
Low
292.19%4.462212.5510A 2C
+8.47%
0.00%
-
Stage 39
Stage 39
High
765.02%7.68096.778A 4C
+37.88%
-10.34%
-
Stage 40
Stage 40
Med
397.55%5.726226.3729A 2C
+11.36%
+8.63%
-

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.