Match Performance
Your Performance
68.75% of winner
Place:2 / 2
Match %:68.75%
Match Pts:1943.92
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:68.00%
Std Dev:10.2
Spread:58.1 pts
Hits:442A 113C 14D 1NS 2NPM
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
41.94% (S23)
Division Winner
Michał Koronkiewicz
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:2827.34
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:99.05%
Std Dev:5.4
Spread:38.0 pts
Hits:456A 98C 11D 6M
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
62.04% (S1)
40%
70%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 1.5× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
66.36%
23 stages · 41.94% – 79.09%
Low HF(Technical)
73.90%
9 stages · 46.34% – 100.00%
By Stage Length
Short(≤12 shots)
67.11%
15 stages · 41.94% – 100.00%
Medium(13-24 shots)
68.56%
12 stages · 56.47% – 79.09%
Long(25+ shots)
68.05%
5 stages · 62.56% – 77.18%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Low | 1 | 100.00% | 2.9880 | 15.06 | 8A 1C 2D | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 2 | 77.18% | 5.8457 | 25.66 | 28A 3C 1D | +23.01% | -5.06% | |||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Low | 2 | 60.45% | 2.4345 | 16.02 | 6A 3C | +57.37% | -4.88% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 2 | 69.50% | 4.2578 | 33.82 | 25A 6C 1D | +45.90% | +1.41% | |||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Low | 2 | 69.19% | 2.8612 | 20.97 | 12A | +44.52% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 2 | 56.47% | 3.1526 | 31.72 | 17A 5C | +73.62% | -1.96% | |||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 2 | 60.52% | 3.6817 | 8.42 | 5A 2C 2NPM | +24.93% | -24.39% | |||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 2 | 67.04% | 4.1351 | 26.36 | 20A 3C | +64.24% | +10.10% | |||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 2 | 70.45% | 5.7554 | 9.73 | 10A 2C | +47.20% | +3.70% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Low | 2 | 75.46% | 3.2402 | 26.85 | 11A 10C 2D | +28.10% | -3.33% | - | ||
Stage 11 Stage 11 Med | 2 | 51.15% | 3.1615 | 14.55 | 6A 5C 1D | +60.60% | -17.86% | - | ||
Stage 12 Stage 12 Med | 2 | 62.56% | 4.2941 | 30.74 | 22A 7C 1D | +68.81% | +5.60% | - | ||
Stage 13 Stage 13 Low | 1 | 100.00% | 3.8835 | 10.30 | 7A 1C 2D | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 14 Stage 14 Med | 2 | 74.83% | 4.5245 | 23.87 | 18A 6C | +38.78% | +3.85% | |||
Stage 15 Stage 15 Med | 2 | 67.42% | 4.2017 | 10.71 | 6A 5C | +55.22% | +4.65% | |||
Stage 16 Stage 16 Med | 2 | 69.10% | 4.0063 | 25.21 | 16A 7C | +39.20% | -3.81% | |||
Stage 17 Stage 17 Med | 2 | 62.07% | 4.1229 | 12.37 | 9A 2C | +49.40% | -7.27% | - | ||
Stage 18 Stage 18 Med | 2 | 60.05% | 3.9048 | 26.89 | 18A 5C | +57.53% | -5.41% | - | ||
Stage 19 Stage 19 Med | 2 | 75.99% | 4.6434 | 12.06 | 10A 2C | +41.72% | +7.69% | - | ||
Stage 20 Stage 20 Med | 2 | 63.54% | 3.5298 | 30.03 | 18A 5C 1D | +79.39% | +13.98% | - | ||
Stage 21 Stage 21 Med | 2 | 70.23% | 4.7230 | 11.01 | 8A 4C | +37.11% | -3.70% | - | ||
Stage 22 Stage 22 Low | 2 | 76.37% | 3.2869 | 27.99 | 17A 2C 1D | +33.86% | +2.22% | - | ||
Stage 23 Stage 23 Med | 2 | 41.94% | 2.2566 | 23.93 | 10A 1C 1D | +121.99% | -6.90% | - | ||
Stage 24 Stage 24 Med | 2 | 62.76% | 3.3071 | 36.89 | 24A 4C 1NS | +56.78% | -1.61% | - | ||
Stage 25 Stage 25 Med | 2 | 62.26% | 4.1854 | 13.38 | 10A 2C | +60.62% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 26 Stage 26 Med | 2 | 79.09% | 4.6090 | 19.31 | 16A 3C | +29.34% | +2.30% | - | ||
Stage 27 Stage 27 Low | 2 | 46.34% | 2.1209 | 28.29 | 12A | +115.79% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 28 Stage 28 Low | 2 | 75.90% | 3.5663 | 28.04 | 20A | +37.25% | +4.17% | - | ||
Stage 29 Stage 29 Low | 2 | 57.44% | 2.5000 | 16.00 | 6A 3C 1D | +65.80% | -4.76% | - | ||
Stage 30 Stage 30 Med | 2 | 63.50% | 4.1971 | 21.92 | 13A 9C | +57.47% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 31 Stage 31 Med | 2 | 77.66% | 4.4788 | 12.95 | 11A 1C | +33.37% | +3.57% | - | ||
Stage 32 Stage 32 Med | 2 | 67.58% | 3.7298 | 34.05 | 23A 4C | +47.98% | 0.00% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.