Match Performance
Your Performance
65.64% of winner
Place:17 / 22
Match %:65.64%
Match Pts:413.59
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:60.38%
Std Dev:8.8
Spread:31.7 pts
Hits:108A 27C 2D
Best:
78.08% (S1)
Worst:
46.34% (S6)
Division Winner
Tyler McCommon
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:630.05
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:91.98%
Std Dev:5.1
Spread:15.8 pts
Hits:95A 39C 3D
Best:
99.48% (S3)
Worst:
83.72% (S2)
40%
70%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 2.0× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
58.04%
5 stages · 46.34% – 64.51%
Low HF(Technical)
78.08%
1 stage · 78.08%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
61.13%
5 stages · 46.34% – 78.08%
Long(25+ shots)
57.57%
1 stage · 57.57%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM18-08 Stage 1 Low | 13 | 78.08% | 3.5238 | 11.03 | 13A 3C | +48.25% | +5.71% | |||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 16 | 57.57% | 3.3911 | 38.63 | 22A 7C | +73.70% | 0.00% | |||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 17 | 64.51% | 5.1879 | 18.89 | 16A 6C | +65.12% | +6.52% | |||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 17 | 63.05% | 3.4016 | 31.75 | 20A 2C 2D | +47.67% | -6.90% | |||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 19 | 59.48% | 4.0091 | 26.44 | 20A 2C | +71.35% | +1.92% | |||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 21 | 46.34% | 3.6602 | 28.96 | 17A 7C | +115.80% | 0.00% |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.