Match Performance

Your Performance
62.16% of winner
Place:19 / 22
Match %:62.16%
Match Pts:391.62
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:57.17%
Std Dev:10.7
Spread:34.8 pts
Hits:97A 37C 3D
Best:
80.57% (S1)
Worst:
45.81% (S6)
Division Winner
Tyler McCommon
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:630.05
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:91.98%
Std Dev:5.1
Spread:15.8 pts
Hits:95A 39C 3D
Best:
99.48% (S3)
Worst:
83.72% (S2)
40%
70%
100%
You Winner Avg

You have 2.2× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.

Performance by Stage Type

By Hit Factor

Medium HF(Balanced)
54.08%
5 stages · 45.81% – 62.97%
Low HF(Technical)
80.57%
1 stage · 80.57%

By Stage Length

Medium(13-24 shots)
59.17%
5 stages · 45.81% – 80.57%
Long(25+ shots)
49.71%
1 stage · 49.71%

Points by Stage

Stage Results

StagePlace%HFTimeHitsTime GapPoints GapFocusSplitsAnalysis
CM18-08
Stage 1
Low
1180.57%3.63649.7210A 6C
+30.65%
-2.86%
Stage 2
Stage 2
Med
1849.71%2.928140.6417A 11C 1D
+82.73%
-9.16%
-
Stage 3
Stage 3
Med
1862.23%5.004820.7819A 3C
+81.64%
+13.04%
Stage 4
Stage 4
Med
1862.97%3.397331.7919A 4C 1D
+47.86%
-6.90%
Stage 5
Stage 5
Med
2150.99%3.436930.2619A 3C
+96.11%
0.00%
Stage 6
Stage 6
Med
2245.81%3.618526.5313A 10C 1D
+97.69%
-9.43%

Time vs Points Analysis

Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.