Match Performance
Your Performance
44.51% of winner
Place:6 / 6
Match %:44.51%
Match Pts:445.41
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:42.83%
Std Dev:8.5
Spread:34.3 pts
Hits:176A 26C 3D 3M 1NS
Best:
49.56% (S3)
Worst:
15.23% (S2)
Division Winner
Tomasz Chiossi
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:1000.64
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:96.22%
Std Dev:3.5
Spread:9.4 pts
Hits:146A 52C 9D 1M
Best:
100.00% (S5)
Worst:
90.62% (S2)
10%
55%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 3.7× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
42.91%
9 stages · 15.23% – 49.56%
Low HF(Technical)
41.73%
1 stage · 41.73%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
42.37%
8 stages · 15.23% – 49.50%
Long(25+ shots)
43.91%
2 stages · 37.89% – 49.56%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 6 | 49.50% | 2.6910 | 39.39 | 18A 5C 1D | +91.21% | -5.36% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 6 | 15.23% | 1.0511 | 20.93 | 9A 2C 1D 2M 1NS | +118.93% | -66.67% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 6 | 49.56% | 3.8752 | 39.74 | 29A 3C | +118.83% | +8.45% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 6 | 42.98% | 2.9710 | 28.61 | 17A | +163.69% | +13.33% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 6 | 45.97% | 3.5909 | 31.19 | 20A 4C | +119.49% | +0.90% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Low | 6 | 41.73% | 2.0732 | 30.87 | 11A 3C | +147.36% | +3.23% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 6 | 39.35% | 3.3857 | 20.38 | 13A 1C 1D | +136.98% | -6.76% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 6 | 37.89% | 3.2029 | 40.90 | 27A 2C 1M | +156.11% | -2.96% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 6 | 44.30% | 3.7284 | 22.53 | 15A 3C | +123.07% | -1.18% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 6 | 48.94% | 2.9504 | 31.86 | 17A 3C | +120.79% | +8.05% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.