Match Performance
Your Performance
82.16% of winner
Place:5 / 6
Match %:82.16%
Match Pts:822.15
Consistency:Variable
Avg:79.05%
Std Dev:17.9
Spread:59.6 pts
Hits:137A 61C 7D 3M 3NS
Best:
100.00% (S3)
Worst:
40.36% (S2)
Division Winner
Tomasz Chiossi
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:1000.64
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:96.22%
Std Dev:3.5
Spread:9.4 pts
Hits:146A 52C 9D 1M
Best:
100.00% (S5)
Worst:
90.62% (S2)
40%
70%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 6.4× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
77.56%
9 stages · 40.36% – 100.00%
Low HF(Technical)
99.67%
1 stage · 99.67%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
78.14%
8 stages · 40.36% – 99.67%
Long(25+ shots)
81.20%
2 stages · 61.15% – 100.00%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 3 | 86.83% | 4.7206 | 20.76 | 15A 7C 2D | +0.78% | -12.50% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 5 | 40.36% | 2.7864 | 9.69 | 4A 9C 1M 1NS | +1.36% | -59.09% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 1 | 100.00% | 7.8194 | 18.16 | 24A 7C 1D | 0.00% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 3 | 86.04% | 5.9477 | 12.61 | 12A 5C | +16.22% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 4 | 79.40% | 6.2025 | 17.09 | 17A 7C | +20.27% | -4.50% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Low | 2 | 99.67% | 4.9514 | 11.31 | 7A 7C | -9.38% | -9.68% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 5 | 67.53% | 5.8104 | 9.81 | 7A 7C 1D | +14.07% | -22.97% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 5 | 61.15% | 5.1696 | 18.57 | 19A 6C 3D 2M | +16.28% | -28.89% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 5 | 59.91% | 5.0420 | 11.90 | 13A 5C 2NS | +17.82% | -29.41% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 3 | 95.22% | 5.7411 | 17.07 | 19A 1C | +18.30% | +12.64% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.