Match Performance
Your Performance
83.36% of winner
Place:3 / 6
Match %:83.36%
Match Pts:834.18
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:80.21%
Std Dev:11.3
Spread:43.3 pts
Hits:117A 81C 7D 3M
Best:
94.50% (S3)
Worst:
51.21% (S4)
Division Winner
Tomasz Chiossi
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:1000.64
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:96.22%
Std Dev:3.5
Spread:9.4 pts
Hits:146A 52C 9D 1M
Best:
100.00% (S5)
Worst:
90.62% (S2)
50%
75%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 4.6× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
79.48%
9 stages · 51.21% – 94.50%
Low HF(Technical)
90.35%
1 stage · 90.35%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
76.63%
8 stages · 51.21% – 90.35%
Long(25+ shots)
88.65%
2 stages · 82.41% – 94.50%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 5 | 78.67% | 4.2770 | 24.55 | 11A 12C 1D | +19.17% | -6.25% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 4 | 74.56% | 5.1477 | 11.85 | 5A 9C | +23.95% | -7.58% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 2 | 94.50% | 7.3894 | 20.57 | 24A 8C | +13.27% | +7.04% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 5 | 51.21% | 3.5398 | 13.56 | 10A 4C 1D 2M | +24.98% | -36.00% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 3 | 87.36% | 6.8240 | 15.68 | 13A 10C 1D | +10.34% | -3.60% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Low | 3 | 90.35% | 4.4886 | 13.59 | 9A 3C 2D | +8.89% | -1.61% | - | ||
Stage 7 Stage 7 Med | 4 | 68.12% | 5.8615 | 11.26 | 8A 6C 1D | +30.93% | -10.81% | - | ||
Stage 8 Stage 8 Med | 3 | 82.41% | 6.9662 | 19.81 | 18A 12C | +24.05% | +2.22% | - | ||
Stage 9 Stage 9 Med | 4 | 76.26% | 6.4176 | 10.44 | 9A 8C 1M | +3.37% | -21.18% | - | ||
Stage 10 Stage 10 Med | 4 | 81.45% | 4.9107 | 17.92 | 10A 9C 1D | +24.19% | +1.15% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.