Match Performance
Your Performance
88.89% of winner
Place:2 / 8
Match %:88.89%
Match Pts:516.50
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:86.78%
Std Dev:11.2
Spread:37.2 pts
Hits:73A 43C 3D
Best:
100.00% (S2)
Worst:
62.77% (S3)
Division Winner
Piotr Tomaka
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:581.04
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:97.69%
Std Dev:4.6
Spread:13.9 pts
Hits:86A 28C 5D
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
86.11% (S5)
60%
80%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 2.7× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
86.78%
6 stages · 62.77% – 100.00%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
88.23%
4 stages · 62.77% – 100.00%
Long(25+ shots)
85.04%
2 stages · 84.84% – 85.27%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 2 | 84.84% | 6.9739 | 16.49 | 15A 13C 1D | +1.92% | -13.53% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 1 | 100.00% | 5.6582 | 17.32 | 17A 4C 1D | 0.00% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 3 | 62.77% | 4.4413 | 13.96 | 10A 4C | +64.62% | +3.33% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 2 | 85.27% | 5.3463 | 16.46 | 9A 14C 1D | +5.31% | -10.20% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 1 | 100.00% | 7.9827 | 9.27 | 13A 3C | 0.00% | 0.00% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 2 | 81.75% | 6.2112 | 9.66 | 9A 5C | +7.93% | -11.76% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.