Match Performance
Your Performance
50.14% of winner
Place:6 / 8
Match %:50.14%
Match Pts:291.31
Consistency:Consistent
Avg:48.86%
Std Dev:9.7
Spread:31.3 pts
Hits:74A 32C 10D 3M
Best:
74.09% (S6)
Worst:
42.77% (S1)
Division Winner
Piotr Tomaka
Place:1
Match %:100.00%
Match Pts:581.04
Consistency:Very Consistent
Avg:97.69%
Std Dev:4.6
Spread:13.9 pts
Hits:86A 28C 5D
Best:
100.00% (S1)
Worst:
86.11% (S5)
40%
70%
100%
You Winner Avg
You have 2.3× more variance than the winner. Focus on eliminating weak stages rather than trying to win more stages.
Performance by Stage Type
By Hit Factor
Medium HF(Balanced)
48.86%
6 stages · 42.77% – 74.09%
By Stage Length
Medium(13-24 shots)
53.89%
4 stages · 44.17% – 74.09%
Long(25+ shots)
42.83%
2 stages · 42.77% – 42.89%
Points by Stage
Stage Results
| Stage | Place | % | HF | Time | Hits | Time Gap | Points Gap | Focus | Splits | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage 1 Stage 1 Med | 6 | 42.77% | 3.5154 | 34.42 | 18A 10C 1D | +112.73% | -9.02% | - | ||
Stage 2 Stage 2 Med | 5 | 51.35% | 2.9052 | 30.29 | 14A 5C 3D | +74.88% | -10.20% | - | ||
Stage 3 Stage 3 Med | 6 | 44.17% | 3.1250 | 17.92 | 8A 5C 1D | +111.32% | -6.67% | - | ||
Stage 4 Stage 4 Med | 7 | 42.89% | 2.6892 | 21.94 | 14A 6C 1D 3M | +40.37% | -39.80% | - | ||
Stage 5 Stage 5 Med | 7 | 48.21% | 3.8487 | 15.07 | 8A 5C 3D | +62.57% | -21.62% | - | ||
Stage 6 Stage 6 Med | 4 | 74.09% | 5.6288 | 11.37 | 12A 1C 1D | +27.04% | -5.88% | - |
Time vs Points Analysis
Time (X) vs Points (Y) across all stages. Left is faster, up is more accurate.